MONTEREY POP: The First Rock Festival | Essay – The Criterion Collection

MI0002376396By Michael Lydon

The Monterey International Pop Festival is over, all over. And what was it? Was it one festival, many festivals, a festival at all? Does anything sum it up, did it mean anything, are there any themes? Was it just a collection of rock groups of varying levels of proficiency doing their bit for a crowd of thousands who got their fill of whatever pleasure or sensation they sought? Was it the most significant meeting of an avant-garde since the Armory show or some Dadaist happening in the ’20s? Was it, as the stage banner said, “Love, flowers, and music,” or was it Jimi Hendrix playing his guitar like an enormous penis and then burning it, smashing it, and flicking its pieces like holy water into a baffled, berserk audience?

Was it a hundred screaming freak kids with war-painted faces howling and bashing turned-over oil drum trash cans like North African trance dancers, or was it the thousands of sweet hippies who wandered, sat, and slept on the grass with flutes and bongos, beads and bubbles, laughing and loving softly? Was its spirit Simon and Garfunkel, singing like little lost lambie-pie castrati, or was it Ravi Shankar, rocking over his sitar and beating a bare foot while opening up a musical world to 7,000 listeners who, at his request, did not smoke for his three-hour concert? Rolling Stone Brian Jones was part of it, wandering for three days silent inside his blond hair and gossamer pink cape; so was a girl writhing on a bummer at the entrance to the press section; while no one helped, cameramen exhausted themselves recording her agony. Was it a nightmare and something beautiful existing together or a nightmare and many beautiful things existing side by side?

One is left only with questions that a mind be-sodden with sound and sound and sound and sound cannot answer. Saturday night Jerry Garcia of The Grateful Dead commented, “There’s a lot of heavy stuff going on.” Whether he meant music or acid or emotion or everything, he was right. Something very heavy happened at Monterey last weekend.

Those very odd three days began in Friday’s cool gray air as the first of the crowd began to circle through the booths of the fairground. The only word for it then was groovy. A giant Buddha stood in one corner, banners decorated with astrology signs waved, and everything the hippie needs to make his life beautiful was on sale: paper dresses, pins, earrings, buttons, amulets, crosses, posters, balloons, sandals, macrobiotic food, and flowers. There was a soul food stand, the Monterey Kiwanis had fresh corn on the cob, the Congregation Beth El had pastrami sandwiches, and hippies with the munchies snapped their fingers to the popping of the popcorn stand. In the Festival offices Mama Michelle of The Mamas and the Papas was hard at work doing everything from typing to answering the phone. Papa John was keeping his cool in his gray fur hat which he never once took off in the frantic chaos.

Nothing but chaos could have been expected. The whole Festival had been nothing more than an idea two months before in the head of publicist Derek Taylor and in the rush of preparation had changed itself many times.

At first it was to be a commercial proposition; then Taylor, unable to raise the money needed to pay advances to the invited groups, had gone to Phillips and Dunhill producer Lou Adler for bankrolling. Why not make it a charity and get everyone to come for free, they suggested, and suddenly it became not a money-spinning operation but a happening generated by the groups themselves, which hopefully would make some composite statement of pop music in June 1967.

The Festival was incorporated with a board of governors that included Donovan, Mick Jagger, Andrew Oldham, Paul Simon, Phillips, Smokey Robinson, Roger McGuinn, Brian Wilson, and Paul McCartney. “The Festival hopes to create an atmosphere wherein persons in the popular music field from all parts of the world will congregate, perform, and exchange ideas concerning popular music with each other and with the public at large,” said a release. After paying the entertainers’ expenses, the profits from ticket sales (seats ranged from $3.50 to $6.50; admission to the grounds without a seat was $1) were to go to charities and to fund fellowships in the pop field. Despite rumors that part of the money would go to the Diggers in both Los Angeles and San Francisco to help them cope with the “hippie invasions,” so far no decision has been made on where the money will go.

This vagueness and the high prices engendered charges of commercialism—“Does anybody really know where these L.A. types are at?” asked one San Francisco rock musician. And when the list of performers was released there was more confusion. Where were the Negro stars, the people who began it all, asked some. Where were The Lovin’ Spoonful, the Stones, the Motown groups; does a pop festival mean anything without Dylan, the Stones, and The Beatles?

“Here they are trying to do something new,” said the Fillmore’s Bill Graham, “and they end up with group after group just like the jazz festivals. Will anybody have the chance to spread out if they feel like it?”

But as the Festival unfolded it was clear that if not perfect, the Festival was as good as it could have been. The Spoonful could not come because of possible charges that could be brought on a pot bust they had helped to engineer to avoid a possession charge against themselves; it was rumored, moreover, that John Sebastian wants to spend all his time writing and that they are breaking up as a group. Two of the Stones are facing pot charges of their own in England. Smokey Robinson and Berry Gordy were enthusiastic about the Festival at first, John Phillips said, “then they never answered the phone. Smokey was completely inactive as a director. I think it might be a Jim Crow thing. A lot of people put Lou Rawls down for appearing. ‘You’re going to a Whitey festival, man,’ was the line. There is tension between the white groups who are getting their own ideas and the Negroes who are just repeating theirs. The tension is lessening all the time, but it did crop up here, I am sure.”

Phillips also reported that Chuck Berry was invited. “I told him on the phone, ‘Chuck, it’s for charity,’ and he said to me, ‘Chuck Berry has only one charity and that’s Chuck Berry. $2,000.’ We couldn’t make an exception.” Bob Dylan is still keeping his isolation after the accident which broke his neck last summer, and though rumors persisted up to the last minute Sunday night that The Beatles would show, or at least were in Monterey, they decided to keep their “no more appearances” vow. Dionne Warwick made a last minute bow out, and The Beach Boys, whose Carl Wilson faced a draft evasion charge, decided to lay low.

Yet as the sound poured out incessantly—the concerts with nary an intermission averaged five hours in length (can you imagine going to four uncut top volume Hamlets in three days, or sitting in the Indianapolis pits while they re-ran the race eight times over a weekend?)––gaps were not noticed. One dealt with what was at hand, and what was there was very, very good indeed. There were a few disasters who can be written off from the start. Laura Nyro, a melodramatic singer accompanied by two dancing girls who pranced absurdly; Hugh Masekela, whose trumpet is only slightly better than his voice—he did, however, do some nice backing for The Byrds on “So You Want to Be a Rock ‘n’ Roll Star,” and Johnny Rivers, dressed like an L.A. hippie, who had the gall to sing The Beatles’ “Help” not once but twice. Others, like The Association, with their slick high-schooly humor, didn’t fit in; still others, like Canned Heat, an L.A.-based blues band, had bad days. But the majority rose to new heights for the concert. There was the feeling that this was the place, that the vibrations were right, that one was performing for one’s peers and superiors, that anything and everything was one capable of was demanded. “I saw a community form and live together for three days,” said Brian Jones Sunday night. “It is so sad that it has to break up.”

That community was formed not only on the stage between the performers and the audience but backstage, at the artists’ retreat behind the arena called the Hunt Club, and in the motel rooms where parties went on till dawn. There was little off-stage jamming (no motels had the space, proper wall thickness, or power) except for a four-hour blast between the Dead, the Airplane, and Jimi Hendrix that carried the members to breakfast Monday morning after everyone else had gone home, yet everyone talked, listened, and grooved with everyone else. The variety of music was tremendous, blues to folk to rock to freak. There were big stars, old stars, comers, and groups who avoid the whole star bag. If one was good, in whatever bag, one was accepted. Music styles were not barriers; however disparate the criteria, there seemed to be some consensus on what was real music and what was not.

The Festival had a sort of rhythm to it that was undoubtedly coincidental—the organizers swore that there was no implicit ranking in the order of the acts—but which worked. Friday night was a mixed bag to get things moving, Saturday afternoon was blues, old and gutty and new and wild. Saturday night opened some of the new directions, then a return to peace with Shankar Sunday afternoon; and a final orgiastic freak-out Sunday night.

Montery 67_6283

The Association began it all in the cool gray of Friday night with a professional style and entertaining manner, doing a fine job on their sweetly raucous hit single, “Windy.” Then The Paupers, a four-man group from Toronto, provided the first surprise. The almost unknown group, managed by Albert Grossman, Dylan’s grandmotherly and shrewd mentor, was able to get a screaming volume and a racy quality unmatched by some of the bigger groups. “I found them at the Whisky A Go-Go in New York,” Grossman said. “They were cutting The Jefferson Airplane to pieces so I signed them up.” Only together seven months they are sure to get better. “We are trying to create a total environment with sound alone,” said lead guitarist Chuck Beale. “Sound is enough. We don’t use lights or any gimmicks. When we record we never double-track or use any other instruments. What the four of us can do is the sound we make. That’s all.”

Lou Rawls, the blues singer whose “Dead End Street” is currently in the charts, came next and pulled the audience back to what he called “rock ‘n’ soul.” Backed by a big band, he looked as if he would have been more at home in a night club, but his fine funky voice and from-the-heart monologues about the nitty-gritty of Negro life were soulful indeed. To watch him was to be back at the Apollo where rock is flashy, stylish, and flamboyant, but still communicating with the kids high in the balcony. “The blues,” he said as he came off exhilarated, “is the way of the future. The fads come and go, but the blues remain. The blues is the music that makes a universal language.” Other music at the Festival seemed also to speak to all, but Rawls, a solid member of the professional black school of music, hit one major thread: the new music is still close to the blues, and most of the far-out sounds in the three days were but new blues ideas. He also had his finger on another key truth: “I’m trying to portray the facts as they stand. A few years ago rock was all facade, all doo-wah-diddy-diddy, all prettied up. I get the feeling that people now are trying their best to be where it’s at.”

After Johnny Rivers stayed on too long, Eric Burdon, one of the best white blues singers around, romped through a half dozen numbers with his new Animals, the high point coming with “Paint it Black,” the Jagger-Richards masterpiece which he, unbelievably, improved upon, particularly with the zany screechings of an electric violin. Brian Jones, sitting in the dirt of an aisle, applauded wildly.

Simon and Garfunkel finished off the night, and what can one say about them? “Homeward Bound” brought back memories of the time when a sweet folk-rock seemed to be the new direction, but though the song sounded nice enough, they seemed sadly left behind. “Benedictus” had them harmonizing like choirboys, and they did an encore, a funny new nonsense song, “I Wish I Was a Kellogg’s Cornflake.” When the last note floated out about 1:30 A.M., the first night was over and the peace was extraordinary. While the lucky (or unlucky?) few drove to their motels, the mass of the crowd drifted to the huge camping area near the arena and to the football field at Monterey Peninsula College nearby. There, with the sweet smell of pot drifting over sleeping bags, the music continued in singing and talking and in just being.

In the bright hot sun of Saturday afternoon the serious blues shouting began. Canned Heat led off with an uninspired set, and then came one of the most fantastic events of the whole shebang: the voice of Janis Joplin, singer of Big Brother and the Holding Company, a San Francisco group almost entirely unknown outside of the Bay Area. A former folk singer from Port Arthur, Texas, Janis was turned on a year ago by Otis Redding, and now she sings with equal energy and soul. In a gold-knit pants suit with no bra underneath, Janis leapt, bent double, and screwed up her plain face as she sang like a demonic angel. It was the blues big mama style, tough, raw, and gutsy, and with an aching that few black singers reach. The group behind her drove her and fed from her, building the total volume sound that has become a San Francisco trademark. The final number, “Ball and Chain,” which had Janis singing (singing?––talking, crying, moaning, howling) long solo sections, had the audience on their feet for the first time. “She is the best white blues singer I have ever heard,” commented S.F.Examiner jazz critic Phil Elwood.

Country Joe and the Fish, the acid-political group from Berkeley came next, and while they did not reach their accustomed heights, their funny satirical words and oddly dissonant music went over well. They did two of their political songs. “Please Don’t Drop That H-Bomb on Me, You Can Drop It on Yourself,” whose title is the complete lyric, and “Whoopie, We’re All Going to Die,” which contains the memorable line, “Be the first on your block to have your boy come home in a box.” These were among the very few explicit protest songs at the Festival; nowadays rock musicians are musicians first and protesters a slow second. “There are two parts to music,” said the lead guitarist and music writer for Country Joe, Barry Melton, “the music and the lyrics. Music we have with everybody, but some say the lyrics shouldn’t be political. Everybody agrees with us on the war, but we feel that in this society, you have to make your stance clear. Others don’t want to speak up in songs, be right up front. That’s why we put politics in.” Melton’s songs, particularly “Not-So-Sweet Martha Lorraine,” a nightmarish song about a mysterious lady who “hides on a shelf filled with volumes of literature based on herself” and who gets high with death, have been called “pure acid,” but Melton says all music is psychedelic. “One part of LSD is liberation, do what you want to do. I feel I do that, do what I want to do. When I hear a sound that is groovy I use it. I try to find music all over the place. Listening to anything can give you musical ideas. That’s freedom, and maybe that’s psychedelic.” He spoke for most of the groups. It would be hard to find any of the musicians who had not taken LSD or at least smoked pot, but by now it has become so accepted that it’s nothing to be remarked on by itself. Acid opened minds to new images, new sounds, and made them embrace a wild eclecticism, but rather than being “acid” as such, it has become music.

Al Kooper, an organist who has often played with Dylan, took half an hour with some funky blues organ and vocal, but the action began again with The Paul Butterfield Blues Band, a newly constituted version of the group that, more than any other group, led the revival of white interest in blues bands. Led by Butterfield’s fine voice and better harmonica, and with the strange melancholic whimsy of Elvin Bishop’s guitar, the backup band of bass guitar, trumpet, sax, and drums rocketed through some very impressive work. They also returned for the Saturday night show, with Bishop showing off his odd voice on a gloomy blues, “Have Mercy This Morning.” The Butterfield group, which began years ago, gigging with Muddy Waters in Chicago, knew, unlike Quicksilver Messenger Service and The Steve Miller Blues Band who followed, precisely what it was doing. Without being uptight, Butterfield was precise. They swung deftly on a broad emotional range, but the strongest memory is the haunting, looping sound of Butterfield’s harmonica as it broke a small solo of just a few notes into tiny bits and experimented with their regroupings.

The blues afternoon ended with a group that had no idea (apparently) what it was doing but did it with such a crazy yelping verve that it looked like in time it could do anything it wanted. Billed as The Electric Flag, it was the first time it had ever played together, and under that name it never will play again. Its leader, guitarist Mike Bloomfield, has been gradually building the band after leaving Butterfield’s group a few months ago. Its name in the future will be “Thee, Sound.” “As in ‘dedicated to thee, sound,’” says Bloomfield, “the whole world of sound, not just music.” Its set was an astounding masterpiece of chaos with rapport. Drummer Buddy Miles, a big Negro with a wild “’do” who looks like a tough soul brother from Detroit and who is actually a prep school-educated son of a well-to-do Omaha family, sings and plays with TNT energy, knocking over cymbals as he plays. Barry Goldberg controls the organ, and Nick “the Greek” Gravenites writes the songs and does a lot of the singing. The group was, for the groups present as well as the audience, a smash success. The Byrds’ David Crosby announced from the stage Saturday night, “Man, if you didn’t hear Mike Bloomfield’s group, man, you are out of it, so far out of it.”

The afternoon concert rode out with The Electric Flag on a wave of excitement that faltered in the evening concert. There was a curious feeling around late Saturday; everything was still very groovy, but the sweetness was going. The excitement of the music was getting too high. That stalled Saturday night but the level did not diminish. San Francisco’s Moby Grape led off the concert overshadowed by the rumor, fed by the ambiguous statements of the Festival management, that The Beatles would appear for the record arena audience of 8,500. The Grape had a driving excitement and some very nice playing with the four guitars, but no particular impression stands out. Masekela was terrible but Big Black, his conga player, was brilliant, holding up his reputation as the best conga player in the business. The Byrds were disappointing. Considered by many to be America’s Beatles, they were good, doing several new songs, but they lacked the excitement to get things moving. Butterfield was not as good as he had been in the afternoon and went on too long, and the evening hit bottom with Laura Nyro.

From there on things got better. Jefferson Airplane were fantastically good. Backed with the light show put on by Headlights, who do the lights at the Fillmore, they created a special magic. Before they came on the question hung: is the Airplane as good as its reputation? They thoroughly proved themselves. As they played, hundreds of artists, stagehands, and hangers-on swarmed on to the stage dancing. Grace Slick, in a long light blue robe, sang as if possessed, her harshly fine voice filling the night. In a new song, “Ballad of You and Me and Prunielle,” they surpassed themselves, playing largely in the dark, the light show looming above them, its multicolored blobs shaping and re-shaping, primeval molecules eating up tiny bubbles like food then splitting into shimmering atoms. The guitar sounds came from outer space and inner mind, and while everything was going—drums, guitar, and the feedback sounds of the amplifiers, Marty Balin shouted over and over the closing line, “Will the moon still hang in the sky, when I die, when I die, when I die.” They were showered with orchids as they left the stage.

In no time Booker T. and the MG’s were on rocking through some dynamic blues, and suddenly Otis Redding was there, singing the way Jimmy Brown charged in football. “Shake,” he shouted, “Shake, everybody, shake,” shaking himself like a madman in his electric green suit. What was it like? I wrote at the time, “ecstasy, madness, loss, total, screaming, fantastic.” It started to rain and Redding sang two songs that started slow, “to bring the pace down a bit,” he said, but in no time the energy was back up again.

“Try a Little Tenderness,” he closed with, and by the end it reached a new orgiastic pitch. A standing screaming crowd brought him back and back and back.

Day two was over and Sunday came gray and cold but the excitement was still there and growing. Could anyone believe what had happened, what might happen? Hours of noise had both deafened and opened thousands of minds. One had lived in sound for hours: the ears had come to dominate the senses. Ears rung as one slept; dreams were audible as well as visual.

Sunday afternoon was Shankar, and one felt a return to peace. And yet there was an excitement in his purity, as well as in his face and body, and that of the tabla player whose face matched Chaplin’s in its expressive range. For three hours they played music, and after the first strangeness, it was not Indian music, but music, a particular realization of what music could be. It was all brilliant, but in a long solo from the 16th century Shankar had the whole audience, including all the musicians at the Festival, rapt. Before he played, he spoke briefly. The work, he said, was a very spiritual one and he asked that no pictures be taken (the paparazzi lay down like lambs). He thanked everyone for not smoking, and said with feeling, “I love all of you, and how grateful I am for your love of me. What am I doing at a pop festival when my music is classical? I knew I’d be meeting you all at one place, you to whom music means so much. This is not pop but I am glad it is popular.” With that he began the long melancholic piece. To all appearances he had 7,000 people with him, and when he finished, he stood, bowed with his hands clasped to his forehead, and then, smiling, threw back to the crowd the flowers that had been showered on him.

Sunday night the Festival reached its only logical conclusion. The passion, anticipation, and adventure into sound had gone as far as any could have thought possible, and yet it had to go further. Flowers and a groovy kind of love may be elements in the hippie world, but they have little place in hippie rock. The hippie liberation is there, so is a personal kindness, openness, and pleasantness that make new rock musicians easy to talk to, but in their music there is a feeling of a stringent demand on the senses, an experimenting with the techniques of assault, a toying with the idea of beautiful ugliness, the creativeness of destruction, and the loss of self into whatever may come.

One of the major elements in this open-mindedness is feedback. Feedback is nothing new; anyone who has played an electric guitar has experienced it. Simply, feedback happens when a note from a vibrating string comes out of the amplifier louder than it went in and re-reverberates the string. The new vibration adds to the old, and thus the note comes out of the amp louder still. Theoretically the process could go on, the note getting louder and louder, until the amp blows out. In practice it can be controlled so that the continuing note is held as with a piano’s sustain pedal. That means that behind their strumming and picking, the musicians can build up a level of pure electronic noise, which they can vary by turning to face the amp or face away, moving toward it or moving away. Feedback can tremendously increase a group’s volume, produce yelps, squeals, screams, pitches that rise and rise, that squeak, blare, or yodel wildly. If nothing else, this Festival established feedback. One major test of each group was their ability in using feedback, and though it has many uses and effects, overall it creates a musical equivalent of madness. Every night featured feedback, but Sunday night was feedback night and a complete exploration of a new direction in pop music.

296_large_1

The night was foreshadowed by the first group, The Blues Project, the New York band that shares the new blues limelight with Paul Butterfield. Their first song featured electric flute in the hands of Andy Kulberg. It was part blues, part Scottish air, part weird phrases that became images of ambiguity. Big Brother and the Holding Company came back and were weaker than they had been, but one short number, “Hairy,” was a minute composed of short bursts of utter electronic blare, chopped up into John Cage-like silences. A group too new to have a name—The Group With No Name—was their billing—were terrible and may well not last long enough to get a name. Buffalo Springfield was totally professional, but largely undistinguished, except for a closing song, “Bluebird,” which alternated from the sweet sound to the total sound.

And then came The Who. Long popular in England where they achieved notoriety for their wild acts at London’s Marquee Club, they had never been seen in America. They were dressed in a wild magnificence, like dandies from the 17th, 19th, and 21st centuries. They opened with one of their English hits, “Substitute” (“I’m just a substitute for another guy, I look pretty tall but my heels are high”), with singer Roger Daltrey swirling around the stage in a gothic shawl decorated with pink flowers, and Keith Moon defining the berserk at the drums—he broke three drumsticks in the first song and overturned one of his snares. They had a good, very close sound, excellent lyrics, and the flashiest guitar presence of any group to appear.

Then John Entwistle, bass guitar, stepped to the mike and said, “This is where it all ends,” and they began “My Generation,” the song that made them famous. A violently arrogant demand for the supremacy of youth—“Things, they say, look awful cold, Hope I die before I get old”—the song has Daltrey stammering on “my g-g-generation” as if overcome by hatred or by drugs. After about four minutes of the song, Daltrey began to swing his handheld mike over his head; Townshend smashed his guitar strings against the mike stand before him, building up the feedback. Then he ran and played the guitar directly into his amp. The feedback went wild, and then he lit a smoke bomb before the amp so it looked like it had blown up, and smoke billowed on the stage. He lifted his guitar from his neck and smashed it on the stage, again, again, again, and it broke, one piece sailing into the crowd. Moon went psychopath at the drums, kicking them through with his feet, knocking them down, trampling on the mikes. The noise continued from the guitar as everything fell and crashed in the smoke. Then they stopped playing and walked off unconcerned, leaving only the hum of an amp turned on at full volume.

It was known to be a planned act, but, like the similar scene in the film BlowUp (inspired by The Who), had a fantastic dramatic intensity. And no meaning. No meaning whatever. There was no passion, no anger, just destruction. And it was over as it began. Stagehands came out and set up for the next act.

That was The Grateful Dead and they were beautiful. They did at top volume what Shankar had done softly. They played pure music, some of the best music of the concert. I have never heard anything in music which could be said to be qualitatively better than the performance of the Dead Sunday night. The strangest of the San Francisco groups, the Dead live together in a big house on Ashbury Street, and living together seems to have made them totally together musically. Jerry Garcia, lead guitarist, and owner of the bushiest head at the Festival, was the best guitarist of the whole show. The Dead’s songs lasted twenty minutes and more, each a masterpiece of five-man improvisation. Beside Garcia there is Phil Lesh on bass, Bob Weir on rhythm guitar, Bill Sommers on drums, and Pigpen (who seldom talks) on organ. Each man’s part was isolated, yet the sound was solid as a rock. It is impossible to remember what it was like. I wrote down at the time: “accumulated sound like wild honey on a moving plate in gobs…three guitars together, music, music, pure, high and fancy…in it all a meditation by Jerry on a melancholy theme…the total in all parts…loud quiets as they go on and on and on…sounds get there then hold while new ones float up, Jerry to Pigpen, then to drums, then to Lesh, talking, playing, laughing, exulting.”

That sounds crazy now, but that’s how it seemed. The Dead built a driving, unshakable rhythm which acted not just as rhythm, but as a wall of noise on which the solos were etched. The solos were barley perceptible in the din, yet they were there like fine scrolls on granite. At moments Garcia and Weir played like one instrument, rocking toward each other. Garcia could do anything. One moment he hunched over, totally intent on his strings, then he would pull away and prance with his fat ungainly body, then play directly to some face he picked out in the crowd straining up to the stage. Phil Lesh called to the audience as they began, “Anybody who wants to dance, dance. You’re sitting on folding chairs, and folding chairs are for folding up and dancing on.” But the crowds were restrained by ushers, and those who danced on stage were stopped by nervous stagehands. It was one of the few times that the loose reins of the Festival were tightened. Was it necessary? Who knows? But without dancing, The Dead didn’t know how well they had done. Lesh was dripping with sweat and nervous as he came off, but each word of praise from onlookers opened him up. “Man, it was impossible to know how we were doing without seeing people moving. We feed on that, we need it, but, oh, man, we did our thing, we did our thing.”

They certainly did. The Dead Sunday night were the definition of virtuoso performance. Could anybody come on after the Dead? Could anyone or anything top them? Yes, one man: Jimi Hendrix, introduced by Brian Jones as “the most exciting guitar player I’ve ever heard.” Hendrix is a strange-looking fellow. Very thin, with a big head and a protuberant jaw, Hendrix has a tremendous bush of hair held in place carelessly by an Apache headband. He is both curiously beautiful and as wildly grotesque as the proverbial Wild Man of Borneo. He wore scarlet pants and a scarlet boa, a pink jacket over a yellow and black vest over a white ruffled shirt. He played his guitar left-handed, if in Hendrix’s hands it was still a guitar. It was, in symbolic fact, a weapon which he brandished, his own penis which he paraded before the crowd and masturbated; it was a woman whom he made love to by straddling and by eating it while playing the strings with his teeth, and in the end it was a torch he destroyed. In a way, the heavily erotic feeling of his act was absurd. A guitarist of long experience with Little Richard, Ike and Tina Turner, and the like, he had learned most of his tricks from the masters in an endless series of club gigs on the southern chitlin’ circuit.

But dressed as he was and playing with a savage wildness—again, how to describe it? I wrote at the time: “total scream…I suppose there are people who enjoy bum trips…end of everything…decay…nothing louder exists, 2,000 instruments (in fact there were three: guitar, bass, and drums)…five tons of glass falling over a cliff and landing on dynamite.” The act became more than an extension of Elvis’ gyrations, it became an extension of that to infinity, an orgy of noise so wound up that I felt that the dynamo that powered it would fail and fission into its primordial atomic state. Hendrix did not only pick the strings, he bashed them with the flat of his hand, he ripped at them, rubbed them against the mike, and pushed them with his groin into his amplifier. And when he knelt before the guitar as if it were a victim to be sacrificed, sprayed it with lighter fluid, and ignited it, it was exactly a sacrifice: the offering of the perfect, most beloved thing, so its destruction could ennoble him further.

But what do you play when your instrument is burnt? Where can you go next? “I don’t know, man,” said Hendrix with a laugh after the show. “I think this has gone about as far as it can go.” “In England they’ve reached a dead end in destruction,” said Brian Jones. “Groups like The Move and The Creation are destroying whole cars on stage.” Asked what it all meant, Andrew Loog Oldham, whose Rolling Stones have pushed far into their own violence kick, said, “If you enjoy it, it’s okay,” and the screaming, frightened but aroused audience apparently enjoyed it very much.

After a short and only mildly recuperative silence, on came The Mamas and the Papas, backed by vibes, drums, tympani, piano, and John Phillips’ guitar. They were great, everything The Mamas and the Papas should be. Mama Cass was in fine form, joking, laughing, and hamming it up like a camp Queen Victoria. Introducing “California Dreamin’,” she said, “We’re gonna do this song because we like it and because it is responsible for our great wealth.” When they finished, a wave of applause swept from the furthermost reaches of the crowd up to the stage and the hundred or more musicians, stagehands, and hangers-on dancing and shouting in the wings. “We’re gonna have this Festival every year,” said Mama Cass, “so you can stay if you want.” The roar of renewed applause almost convinced me that the crowd would patiently wait through the summer, fall, and winter, never stirring until next June.

* * *

Now that the Monterey Pop Festival is a day in the past, what did it prove about pop music? In a way, it proved little. Pop has few of the formal identifying qualities of jazz or folk, and so it did not prove that pop music is now here or there or anyplace. It did show that pop is still in a continuum with the blues, still loves and gets inspiration from the blues. It also showed that LSD and the psychedelics have tremendously broadened the minds of the young people making the new music.

It also demonstrated the continuing influence of The Beatles. Dozens of the other Monterey performers owe their being there to The Beatles. John Phillips was a folk singer until he heard The Beatles. “They were not so much a musical influence,” he said, “as an influence because they showed that intelligent people could work in rock and make their intelligence show.” Moreover, Monterey Pop ratified the shift away from folk music that has been going on for over two years. The Festival was, among other things, the largest collection of former folk singers and guitarists ever gathered in one place. Musicians trained in folk make up the bulk of the new rockers. This means that they came to rock ‘n’ roll, not as the only form, not the one they were trained in, but as an experiment, as a form they looked at first from the outside and rather distantly considered its possibilities.

That sense of experiment makes rock so lively today. The years of folk training, in which the two marks of status were knowledge of esoterica and the quality of performance, mean that the new rockers feel a need to push further and further ahead, and also that they are excellent players. The general level of musical competence was extremely high, and the heights hit by Mike Bloomfield and Jerry Garcia were as high as those reached by Chuck Berry, Bo Diddley, Doc Watson, and other immortal folk and rock guitarists.

In some ways it was surprising that there was little experimentation in some directions. No group went far afield from the basic instrumental lineup, staging, song lengths, and musical form. This indicates that rock is still rather traditional, that it is still a commercial art, that the public will not take leaps forward that are too wild, that the performers are still young and unsure of themselves, and that the rock revolution is still new.

This may all change, and if it does, the Festival will have played an important role. Brian Jones was right: for three days a community formed. Rock musicians, whatever their bag, came together, heard each other, praised each other, and saw that the scene was open enough for them to play as they liked and still get an audience. They will return to their own scenes refreshed and confident. The whole rock-hippie scene was vindicated. Even the police thought it was groovy. Monterey police chief Frank Marinello was so ecstatic that Saturday afternoon he sent half his force home. “I’m beginning to like these hippies,” he told reporters. “When I go up to that Haight-Ashbury, I’m going to see a lot of friends.” The fairgrounds, which at times held 40,000 people, far more than any other time in its history, were utterly peaceful. The tacit arrangement that there would be no busts for anything less than a blatant pot orgy was respected by both sides. When Mama Cass introduced “California Dreamin’” at 12:30 Monday morning, she said, “This whole weekend was a dream come true.”

Michael Lydon, a writer and musician, began reporting on pop music in the sixties. He is the author of the book Flashbacks. This piece originally appeared in the Criterion Collection’s 2002 edition of Monterey Pop.

via Monterey Pop: The First Rock Festival – From the Current – The Criterion Collection.

Posted in Concert, Documentary, Festival, Film, Folk, Instrumental, Live, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Rock 'n' Roll, Song, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MONTEREY INTERNATIONAL POP FESTIVAL: The DVD Journal | Reviews : The Complete Monterey Pop Festival

Monterey-Pop-Festival-Poster-1967

The Complete Monterey Pop Festival:
The Criterion Collection

Home Vision Entertainment

Starring Jimi Hendrix, Otis Redding, The Mamas and The Papas, The Who,
Simon & Garfunkel, Jefferson Airplane, Janis Joplin, Ravi Shankar, and more

Directed by D.A. Pennebaker

Review by Mark Bourne                    

It’s now decades after the event. Jimi, Janis, Cass, Otis, Keith, and so many others aren’t with us anymore. Still, somewhere out there are thousands of former “flower children” who can load up these three DVDs and show their children (or grandchildren!) what it was like back in the day. Back when they were there, man, at Monterey. Back when the Monterey International Pop Festival brought together an era-defining confluence of rock, blues, soul, ballads, psychedelia, and jazz that spoke for a generation in ways that scared hell out of the old folks. Whether you were there or not — even born or not — fans of the music that played for three days in June 1967 should jump on this superb Criterion release as if it were the last chopper out of ‘Nam.

DVD cover

The concert

Over the June 16-18 weekend in the Summer of Love and Sgt. Pepper, 200,000 young people traveled to Monterey, a small coastal city about 80 miles south of San Francisco, to experience something good. Little did they know. The first and arguably greatest of the Woodstock-era outdoor rock concerts, the Monterey Festival altered the landscape of popular music while giving a public face to the “love, flowers, and music” youth culture that helped shape the fractious Vietnam War years. “Be happy, be free; wear flowers, bring bells — have a festival” entreated the program book. The country’s social frictions, which would soon boil over in bloody ways, faded to the background while 100,000 Hawaiian orchids fluttered from an airplane over the peaceful gathering of the tribes. The Byrds’ Chris Hillman told Billboard magazine that Monterey was “the best rock festival ever” not only because of its wide spectrum of talent — it didn’t have the drug overdoses, mud, and lack of any amenities that marred Woodstock two years later. “There were no negatives at all. Everything worked, and it was such a well-run show that it set a precedent never to be equaled.”

Many of the performers — such as The Mamas and The Papas, The Grateful Dead, and Jefferson Airplane — were already familiar to this audience. Monterey is, though, best remembered for the new talent it introduced, breakout performers who would soon shape rock music for generations afterward. An underground legend in England yet all but unknown in his home country, Jimi Hendrix became famous at Monterey by bringing his guitar to a masterful screaming orgasm before setting his pink, hand-painted Stratocaster ablaze on stage. The Who were popular in England, but it wasn’t until Monterey that Pete Townshend, Roger Daltrey, John Entwistle, and drumstick-flinging Keith Moon’s new sophisticated sound and equipment-smashing theatrics concluding “My Generation” were steel-press stamped into the American pop rock scene. Janis Joplin rips open her heart and soul to rise from relative obscurity in the Bay Area clubs. An established star with black audiences, soul singer Otis Redding found a permanent new audience with Monterey’s largely white “love crowd.” Similarly, Indian sitar master Ravi Shankar mesmerized his throng with a three-hour virtuoso set of something utterly new and transcendent.

(The Beatles and The Rolling Stones were two obvious omissions from the guest roster. The Beatles had quit touring in favor of studio work, with Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band released two weeks earlier. Paul McCartney, though, was on the the Festival board, and it was his insistence that Hendrix appear on the bill. The Stones were not allowed to tour America thanks to the recent drug trials of Mick Jagger and Keith Richard. But Stones guitarist Brian Jones did attend. He introduced Hendrix’s performance and, likely due in no small part to his flowing psychedelic attire, was hailed King of the Festival.)

Monterey marked the first rock benefit concert. All the performers played for free, and today the non-profit MIPF Foundation still receives income from Festival merchandizing such as recordings, photos, and, naturally, the films.

Then of course there was the audience. They arrived bedecked in beads and fringe and peace symbols, their faces and balloons and kites and banners and buses painted in cheerful colors and purple-hazy patterns, their heads adorned with flowers to literalize the Festival’s unofficial theme song, Scott McKenzie’s “San Francisco.” And indeed, those who made sure to wear some flowers in their hair really found that “summertime will be a love-in there.”

completemonterey_01

The film

Also present was seminal documentarian D.A. Pennebaker with a phalanx of cameras and crew that included “Direct Cinema” pioneer Albert Maysles (eventually of Gimme Shelter fame). Born in 1925, Pennebaker was more than a decade older than the “never trust anyone over thirty” generation he had begun chronicling in Don’t Look Back, a cinéma vérité portrait of Bob Dylan. When ABC TV hired him to film the Monterey event for a television special, no one could have predicted that “not family-friendly” footage such as Hendrix’s sexually charged performance would keep Pennebaker’s reels off the air. With those ties cut, Pennebaker worked with festival coordinators “Papa” John Phillips and recording mogul Lou Adler to assemble the footage into a feature film. He edited three days and thirty-two acts into 1968’s Monterey Pop, a beatific 79-minute document that set out to catch the look, the feel, and especially the sounds of a seminal moment in American popular culture.

In the mid-1980s, Pennebaker restored some of his most electrifying “lost” footage in two mini-documentaries: Jimi Plays Monterey preserved the full Jimi Hendrix Experience at its peak, and Shake! Otis at Monterey highlighted Redding’s entire rafter-rattling brand of R&B.

completemonterey_03

The DVDs

Now after 35 years, Criterion’s The Complete Monterey Pop Festival presents Pennebaker’s original film struck from a gorgeously restored print. A second disc holds both Jimi Plays Monterey and Shake!, and a third delivers more than two hours of first-rate outtake footage, including more from The Who and numerous acts who never made it into the final cut of Pennebaker’s film at all, such as The Byrds and Buffalo Springfield. Moreover, new commentary tracks, archival video and audio interviews with performers, and a terrific 64-page booklet contribute to one of the all-time great DVD releases. Criterion has put together a release essential for concert film collectors and those for whom the late Sixties are worth remembering with affection and perhaps a little awe.

Disc 1: Monterey Pop

Pennebaker himself supervised this disc’s beautiful restoration and remastering, transforming the original 16mm A and B rolls into a high-def digital transfer that’s clean, crisp, color-corrected, spotless, and grain-free. The audio is, of course, absolutely vital, and it’s a stunner — renowned recording engineer Eddie Kramer, a 30-year veteran studio guru, crafted each room-filling, newly remastered mix on hand here. Extraordinary stadium ambiance shines through in the clear-as-crystal, balls-to-the-wall Dolby 5.1 option, and even that’s surpassed by a phenomenal DTS 5.1 option. The rear channels surround you with vocal and instrumental presence and audience cheers. For purists, the cleaned-up original 2.0 stereo mix is here too.

Monterey Pop opens with a sweet-faced young girl extolling the groovy love vibes to come. Then we’re backstage with John and Michelle Phillips on the phone with Dionne Warwick (who’d dropped out at the last minute), and out front while the audience arrives. With final preparations underway, McKenzie’s “San Francisco” establishes the occasion’s anthem, followed by The Mamas and The Papas’ “Creeque Alley.” In this disc’s commentary track, Adler tells us that one of their goals as festival producers was to give the best possible venue experience to the performers, who worked gratis (Chuck Berry refused his invitation because he wouldn’t be paid). The hope was that years later the musicians would look back at Monterey as a really good gig. Everything from hotel accommodations to backstage food was top-notch, probably the best the musicians had experienced so far in their careers, and that held true for the stage equipment as well. In these first few minutes of Monterey Pop, a pleased David Crosby observes, “Groovy, a decent sound system at last!”

Pennebaker’s vérité style, with its with hand-held cameras and tight close-ups on the performers’ intensity, is plenty familiar nowadays, but here it’s also not too slick or overproduced, arrows sometimes aimed at later projects such as Michael Wadleigh’s documentary Woodstock. Here that “real feel” is a raw-edged and ever-moving virtue. Cameras pan over or zoom into the audience, or across the booths and blankets that turned the fairgrounds into an exotic marketplace. We watch lovers dance or kiss, follow a bald head painted like a hippie phrenologist’s dream, and visit a police chief who notes that there’s talk of the Hell’s Angels and Black Panthers coming down. Pennebaker exhibits an affectionate eye for the pretty girls, in particular one expressive short-cropped blond he returns to several times, and he keeps our sense of days passing by intercutting pre-concert sleepers in their bedrolls or an Illinois girl happy with the privilege of wiping thousands of folding chairs before a day’s events begin. But his emphasis is squarely on the bands. Pennebaker keeps us at arm’s length through a film that doesn’t strive for the intimacy of Woodstock; instead of a documentary emblemizing the “youth movement’s” melding of music with counterculture politics, here we have a dynamic record of a three-day concert, pure and simple.

Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel (looking barely old enough to shave) prove that the Greenwich Village acoustic sound isn’t dead yet with “The 59th Street Bridge Song.” Simon, a member of the Festival’s board of directors, had wanted “Sounds of Silence” to represent the duo in the film, but Pennebaker felt that “feelin’ groovy” better fit his ideal of the more playful pop music sound. Less famous today, regrettably, are Canned Heat, who pump down-and-dirty energy into the Mississippi blues standard “Rollin and Tumblin’,” and South African Hughy Masekela’s head-snapping, brassy “Bajabula Bonke (Healing Song).”

Jefferson Airplane with Grace Slick were better in a studio than on stage, though their set of “High Flyin’ Bird” and “Today” gives us a rare look at the group live. (Their performance in this film so impressed French New Wave director Jean-Luc Godard that in ’68 he shot footage of the group performing a rooftop concert atop a New York hotel. The police arrived and stopped the performance, so Godard’s film, titled One A.M., for “One American Movie,” was never completed.)

We’re there on stage when Cass Elliot and her fellow Mamas and Papas start with “California Dreamin’,” then later when they come back singing “Got a Feelin’.” In one of the film’s highlights, Mama Cass Elliot stares in open-mouthed rapture, and so do we, as Janis wails “Ball & Chain” like a woman feeling in her bones every word she sings. In an audio interview elsewhere on this disc, Cass dubs Janis Joplin the star of the Festival, and here it’s easy to understand why.

Eric Burdon and the Animals offer a straight-ahead rendition of The Stones’ “Paint it Black,” followed by The Who igniting smoke bombs and smashing their kit at the pow! kaboom! climax of “My Generation.” Their destructive finale was already old-hat for them in England, and there had been some backstage tussling over whether they’d appear before or after Hendrix, who also had a big finish in mind.

Country Joe and the Fish’s “Section 43” represents the San Francisco psychedelic rock scene (two years before the band achieves its immortality with Woodstock’s “Fish Cheer”). Then Otis Redding shouts “We all love each other, right? … Let me hear you say YEAH!” and shows the white boys how to kick down the doors with “Shake” and “I’ve Been Loving You Too Long.”

After Rolling Stone Brian Jones introduces Jimi Hendrix and joins the awestruck audience, the cameras are right there on stage when the master, clad like a messiah from outer space, dry-humps his Marshall amps, drives full-thrusters into “Wild Thing,” and ends with his famous fire-ritual exit. The broken guitar neck he hurls into the audience is now on display in Seattle’s Music Experience museum.

Closing out the film is a long set from the third day’s meditative afternoon of Indian ragas, Ravi Shankar’s 18-minute “Raga Bhimpalasi,” which builds into a blurred-fingers frenzy of Eastern rhythms that blisses out the 7,000 people seated at Shankar’s bare feet. Shankar, by the way, nearly backed out of this historic gig. The legendary sitarist, who had just been introduced to the West through his association with George Harrison and The Beatles, admired Hendrix’s virtuosity as a musician, but Jimi’s movements with the guitar — and finally burning it up — were too much. Then when The Who broke their instruments, Shankar was so disturbed that he decided not to play at all. After discussions, it was arranged that Shankar would play a separate three-hour afternoon session with no one before or after. Up there with Jimi and Janis, that session is one of the things people talk about when they talk about Monterey.

completemonterey_04

The commentary track

Aside from the movie itself, Disc One’s full-length audio commentary with Pennebaker and Adler is packed with first-hand information. The wealth of memory from the two men is remarkable. Their fluff-free dialogue focuses on what went on behind the scenes of the Festival’s inception and organization, plenty of observations and reminiscences about performers as we see them, some of the editorial thinking behind who did or didn’t make the final cut, the film’s influence on later work by others, and the troubles and rewards of pulling the whole thing off.

“I was the most ignorant person there,” says Pennebaker, a New Yorker who knew nothing about the bands he was hired to film. “It was a strange kind of Martian adventure for me.” During Shankar’s set, the filmmaker notes that his intention had been to devote the footage to the audience’s reactions to the exotic Indian music, therefore two inexperienced cameramen filmed Shankar on stage. “It turned out to be,” Pennebaker recalls, “the most extraordinarily dramatic piece of music we ever ran across.” Mama Cass Elliot pressured him to cut the lengthy instrumental by saying that nothing could possibly follow it. It took encouragement from writer Truman Capote for Pennebaker to retain the piece, which closes the film with a tremendous standing ovation.

Some of the reminiscing is more personal than historical. For instance, Pennebaker recalls how, the year before recording this track, he got out of a speeding ticket when he appeared before the traffic court judge and she recognized his name; she told him he could park anywhere he wanted and never be fined in her court — she had been at Monterey, knew his connection with the movie, and associated him with that life-changing event in her life.

Supplements

A treasure box labeled Supplements begins with a new half-hour video interview in which Pennebaker and Adler interview each other about the Festival’s roots in a meeting with Paul McCartney at Cass Elliot’s house, the aborted ABC deal, Pennebaker’s Don’t Look Back, and more. Excerpts from four informative archival audio interviews with John Phillips, publicist Derek Taylor, and performers Cass Elliot and David Crosby fill out details of their experiences with the Festival.

Clicking the Scrapbook menu opens a fine selection of ancillary items. For starters, we get an extensive click-through catalog of photos by Elaine Mayes, who shot the Festival for Hullabaloo magazine. Her images, which come with captions, capture performers whose stage time didn’t make Pennebaker’s final cut. She also provides a 12-minute photo essay with her commentary (recorded in 2002 and a must for the serious photojournalist) plus a text bio. The Festival’s massive original program is a fascinating full-color time capsule, so we get it in a click-through page-by-page facsimile of its photos, artwork, and essays written by some of the Festival’s organizers and participants, even Leonard Bernstein on the worthiness of pop as a musical form. A clickable Text option lets you read the essays and poetry blown up and reformatted for your screen.

Finally, Disc One holds the film’s original theatrical trailer; five rather ragged-sounding radio spots with Hendrix, Joplin, Redding, and The Mamas and The Papas; and The Remix, click-through text pages on Eddie Kramer and the exemplary work he did on this DVD set’s audio tracks.

completemonterey_02

Disc 2: Jimi Plays Monterey and Shake! Otis at Monterey

I: Jimi Plays Monterey (49 minutes)

Jimi Plays Monterey isn’t just a collection of previously excised footage. It’s a standalone documentary, introduced by John Phillips, culminating in a lengthy cut of Hendrix’s revolutionary Monterey performance. It opens with Hendrix’s early years as working sideman “Jimi James” in Greenwich Village bars before he’s discovered and coaxed to England by Chas Chandler of The Animals. Early footage of The Jimi Hendrix Experience performing in London (“Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” and “Wild Thing”) includes Hendrix mingling with the rock royalty that he had immediately and explosively joined — Marianne Faithfull, Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Ringo Starr, and George Harrison.

Then, accompanied by Eric Burdon and The Animals’ ode to the Festival, “Monterey,” we’re taken to the concert that graduated Hendrix from a rumor to a legend. Starting with Howling Wolf’s “Killing Floor,” Hendrix goes on to “Foxy Lady” before audaciously making Dylan’s “Like a Rolling Stone” all his own. Then comes B.B. King’s “Rock Me Baby,” “Hey Joe,” “The Wind Cries Mary,” and of course his reinterpretation of The Trogs’ “Wild Thing,” complete with hand-painted pink Strat, the lighter fluid, and one tossed match. It got everyone’s attention.

As with Monterey Pop, here Jimi Plays Monterey comes in a splendid new high-def transfer supervised by Pennebaker. Again, audio options are Dolby 2.0 stereo, DD 5.1, and DTS 5.1, all engineered by Eddie Kramer.

Music critic and historian Charles Shaar Murray dishes out a spirited audio commentary track. A lively encyclopedia of all things Hendrix and the rock scene of the time, Murray has the enthusiasm of a long-time fan and keeps us informed on Hendrix’s casual guitar fluency, showmanship, and thunderous energy. We’re pointed to examples of Hendrix’s astonishing technique, other musicians’ influences on Hendrix and his own on those who came after him, the background of the “teeth routine,” and shots of the shocked audience who’d never seen or heard anything like this before. Murray isn’t a stuffy academic, and keeps a brittle British wit showing through. (He describes The Troggs as the “most magnificently simple-minded rock group of all time prior to the invention of The Ramones.”)

Here also are the original theatrical trailer for Jimi Plays Monterey and a video excerpt, Pete Townshend on Monterey and Jimi Hendrix (4:35). Part of a longer piece videotaped for VH1 is 1987, the excerpt gives Townshend’s bittersweet version of what happened backstage when he and Hendrix, who both knew that they planned to wreck their guitars in front of the audience, used a rancorous coin-toss to decide who was going to go on first.

II: Shake! Otis at Monterey (19 minutes)

Backed by Booker T. and the MGs, Otis Redding was a polished showman who had just returned from a tour of Europe, where he’d learned to play R&B and soul for white audiences. It’s one o’clock in the morning when Otis hits the stage. It has started to rain, but when he launches into Sam Cooke’s “Shake” he takes command of the elements with fast, foot-stompin’, hands-in-the-air rhythm & blues in its classic, purest form. After the propulsive “Shake” and “Respect,” he slows things down with the soulful “I’ve Been Loving You Too Long.” Then he transforms The Stones’ “Satisfaction” into a natural R&B showpiece before closing with “Try a Little Tenderness,” which Pennebaker places over a montage of audience shots from throughout the Festival, notably more of the pretty girls who personified Redding’s dedication to “all the mini-skirts out there.”

Shake! Otis at Monterey, lovingly remastered and remixed exactly like Monterey Pop and Jimi Plays Monterey, comes with two audio commentary tracks by soft-spoken music critic and historian Peter Guralnick, author of the book Sweet Soul Music. The first is on Redding’s Monterey performance, song by song; the second on Redding before and after Monterey. Also here is a 19-minute interview, recorded in 2002, with Phil Walden, Redding’s manager from 1959 until Redding’s death six months after Monterey in December ’67.

Disc 3: The Outtake Performances

Often a performance was cut from Monterey Pop simply because it didn’t represent the group’s best efforts — a singer sang off key, say, or that elusive onstage “magic” just didn’t happen. Sometimes the footage itself turned out to be subpar. And Pennebaker just had to make many difficult editorial (meaning aesthetic, political, or personal) calls.

Therefore, for some aficionados this third disc will be The Complete Monterey Pop‘s mint on the pillow. In 1997 Pennebaker assembled 123 minutes of performances not included in the original film, and much of it is material worthy of a longer recut of Monterey Pop. However, while it’s evident that some visual composition has taken place — for instance, musical numbers intercut with audience shots or Monterey’s crashing sunset surf — this footage is in more of a raw, unrestored state. Likewise, the audio is a clean and strong DD 2.0 stereo, with only two cuts enhanced with optional 5.1 mixes.

The main menu bar’s Artist Index lets you access bio info on each of the bands plus easy-click jumps to their performances. The two cuts remixed to 5.1 are accessible from here.

The multitudinous pleasures here are not solely historical. When Pennebaker edited Monterey Pop, he cut out numerous guest announcer introductions and almost all interaction between the bands and their audiences. One benefit of this disc’s “grab bag” approach is that we get a lot of that back, starting with The Association’s humorous (and unselfconsciously pretentious) self-intro before they dig into their hit “Along Comes Mary.” When David Crosby, then of The Byrds, introduces “He Was a Friend of Mine” by saying that multiple assassins murdered JFK, that witnesses had been killed and information suppressed, he strikes one of the few political notes of the Festival.

In some cases, this lineup merely offers a chance to see performed songs now trapped in the timeless limbo of “Classic Oldies” radio stations. Laura Nyro’s pleasant but bloodless “Wedding Bell Blues” can stand for all such heavy-rotation staples. On the positive side, we get Simon & Garfunkel’s “Homeward Bound” and the fine presentation of “Sounds of Silence” that Simon had wanted included in Pennebaker’s feature film. Soon after comes Jefferson Airplane’s bona fide classic “Somebody to Love,” and Buffalo Springfield’s “For What It’s Worth,” a more relevant battle hymn of The Sixties than Scott McKenzie’s cloying airiness ever was.

completemonterey_05

The Who get 16 minutes, half of which is a tasty portion of a Townshend rock opera, “A Quick One While He’s Away” (use the Artist Index to find its oomphed-up new 5.1 mix). Also given the Artist Index 5.1 treatment is Janis Joplin’s “Combination of the Two,” one of the highlights of these discs. When The Mamas and The Papas close the show with a 20-minute set, we get not only the ethereally adorable (and one month pregnant) Michelle Phillips in her only solo (“Somebody Groovy”), but also Cass Elliott charming the audience with her rapport and her lovelorn hello to John Lennon, for whom she recorded “I Call Your Name.”

Here’s what’s on board — some great footage of great bands in action, mixed among curios that now are just footnotes in rock music’s collective memory:

  • The Association — “Along Comes Mary,” a hit from the Festival’s bow to buttoned-down, nerdy white bands
  • Simon & Garfunkel — “Homeward Bound,” “Sounds of Silence”
  • Country Joe & The Fish — “Not-So-Sweet Martha Lorraine”
  • Al Kooper — “(I Heard Her Say) Wake Me Shake Me”
  • The Paul Butterfield Blues Band — “Driftin’ Blues”
  • Quicksilver Messenger Service — “All I Ever Wanted To Do”
  • The Electric Flag — “Drinkin’ Wine”
  • The Byrds — “Chimes of Freedom, “He Was a Friend of Mine,” “Hey Joe”
  • Laura Nyro — “Wedding Bell Blues,” “Poverty Train”
  • Jefferson Airplane — “Somebody to Love”
  • The Blues Project — “Flute Thing,” a jazz-hued pass-the-roachclip oddity introduced by Tommy Smothers and Paul Simon.
  • Janis Joplin, Big Brother and the Holding Company — “Combination of the Two” (with an optional 5.1 remix under Artist Index)
  • Buffalo Springfield — “For What It’s Worth.” Introduced by Monkee Peter Tork, who gushes “they’re my favorite group,” the band is minus Neil Young, who’d quit the month before, and adds David Crosby on vocals signaling his imminent departure from The Byrds.
  • The Who — “Substitute,” “Summertime Blues,” “A Quick One While He’s Away” (with an optional 5.1 remix under Artist Index)
  • The Mamas and The Papas — “Straight Shooter,” “Somebody Groovy,” “I Call Your Name,” “Monday, Monday,” joined by Scott McKenzie for “San Francisco,” and finally “Dancing in the Street.” (The performance order is as you read it here, rather than the slightly misarranged order printed on the disc’s case.) This closing set all but closed the door on The Mamas and Papas as a group. After years of internal conflicts and romantic tensions, which included Michelle Phillips being kicked out of the band until shortly before Monterey, their final concert happened two months later at the Hollywood Bowl and soon the group disbanded.

Concluding the disc is a nifty snippet tossed in from the archives. Lit only by the flame from a Zippo cigarette lighter in the below-stage commissary called The Hunt Club isTiny Tim (10m: 32s). Tiny Tim was a falsetto-voiced, ukulele-playing novelty act in Greenwich Village clubs and was familiar on TV by being a regular on Laugh-In and other variety shows (he was later married on The Tonight Show in front of Johnny Carson and a studio audience). Pennebaker captures an impromptu performance of this guileless eccentric strumming and singing some old ditties from the vaudeville era. He’s sort of an Antimatter Universe Leon Redbone.

But what about Moby Grape?

The true-blue Monterey cognoscenti have, no doubt, already noted the bands who played the Festival but aren’t represented on any of these discs. Audiences there saw Moby Grape, Lou Rawls, Johnny Rivers, Steve Miller Band, and others, most notably The Grateful Dead, all MIA except for the Mayes photo collection and a very quick glimpse of The Dead in Jimi Plays Monterey. Everything from camera failures to permissions disputes kept some of the Festival unpreserved. According to some accounts, the Dead refused to allow Pennebaker to film their set, which happened Sunday night smack dab between The Who and Jimi Hendrix. Pennebaker himself offers a different take within the exhaustive little book accompanying this DVD set. Other bands were filmed but refused to sign releases for the movie. Janis Joplin’s manager tried to refuse full permission, but her band basically winked at Pennebaker, who recorded their Disc Three set when the manager’s back was turned.

The book

Deserving its own special mention is the thorough 64-page tome prepared for this release. Cut to the same dimensions as each disc’s packaging, this well-produced collection of artwork, photos, and essays spotlights then-and-now perspectives of the Monterey experience, all behind a colorful cover greeting created for the Festival by The Beatles.

A 2002 statement by Pennebaker addresses the absence of some bands, acknowledging that “It’ll never be complete…here’s the best we could put together.” The meat of the book comes from reprints of feature articles about the Festival. Michael Lydon’s in-the-moment account written for Newsweek only forty-eight hours after the event, “Monterey Pop: The First Rock Festival,” is printed here in full for the first time. Next, “Bloody Battle Over Monterey Pop Festival” is Rolling Stone founder Jann Wenner’s retrospective from one year later. It presents a darker view of what went on behind the scenes as it exposes the local and business politics that destroyed the possibility of another Monterey Pop Festival. (The photos of alleged “open fornication” don’t make it into the book.) Looking back after 35 years, music writer Barney Hoskyns sees Monterey as a pivotal moment for the L.A. and San Francisco music scenes and for pop music in general. Finally, film critic Armond White quickly looks at Pennebaker’sMonterey Pop as a pioneering record of the moment. The book concludes with comprehensive production credits plus details about the DVD transfers.

The packaging

Criterion’s painstaking quality standards reach all the way to the packaging. Each disc gets its own book-hinged digipak with a tastefully illustrated paperboard cover. Enclosing them is an attractive and sturdy paperboard box. (Note too, while you’re there, the fun bit of original Festival cartoon art hidden inside the box’s spine.)

Wild thing, I think you mooove me

Criterion’s The Complete Monterey Pop is not just a beautifully produced record of an event important when viewed through the lenses of popular music, cultural history, and simple nostagia. It also represents everything we love about DVD and home theater systems. This one’s among the greats, and it’ll be a long, long time before we see a concert film as mindfully presented as Monterey Pop. Maybe you won’t feel like wearing flowers in your hair. But if you think you can’t groove to these vibrations, man, then it’s time to put away the Austin Powers movies, crank up the volume, and find out what feelin’ groovy was really all about.

—Mark Bourne

  • Color
  • 1.33:1 full screen
  • Single-sided, dual-layered disc (SS-DL)
  • Dolby Digital 2.0 stereo, DD 5.1, DTS 5.1
  • Commentary by Festival producer Lou Adler and D.A. Pennebaker
  • New video interview with Lou Adler and D.A. Pennebaker
  • Audio interviews with Festival producer John Phillips, Festival publicist Derek Taylor, and performers Cass Elliot and David Crosby
  • Photo catalog by Elaine Mayes
  • Photo essay with commentary by photographer Elaine Mayes
  • Original theatrical trailer
  • Orginal theatrical radio spots
  • Facsimile Festival program book
  • Audio commentary on Jimi Plays Monterey by music critic and historian Charles Shaar Murray
  • Original theatrical trailer for Jimi Plays Monterey
  • Video excerpt: Pete Townshend on Monterey and Jimi Hendrix
  • Two audio commentaries on Shake! Otis Redding at Monterey by music critic and historian Peter Guralnick
  • Interview with Phil Walden, Otis Redding’s manager from 1959 to 1967
  • 64-page information book
  • Three covered digipaks inside a paperboard box

via The DVD Journal | Reviews : The Complete Monterey Pop Festival.

Posted in Album, Blues, CD, Concert, Country, Documentary, Documentary, DVD, Film, Folk, Instrumental, Jazz, Live, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Rock 'n' Roll, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

THE BEATLES: “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” | Album Reviews | Pitchfork

Cover-shoot-for-Sgt-Pepper-2Alternate photo cover

The Beatles

Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band

EMI; 1967/2009

By Scott PlagenhoefSeptember 9, 2009

Finally free of touring, the Beatles next sought to be free of themselves, hitting on the rather daft concept of recording as an alias band. The idea held for all of two songs, one coda, and one album sleeve, but was retained as the central organizing and marketing feature of the band’s 1967 album Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Hailed on its release as proof that popular music could be as rich an artistic pursuit as more high-minded media such as jazz and classical, the record’s reputation and sense of ambition ushered in the album era. Its influence was so pervasive and so instructional regarding the way music is crafted and sold to the public that this is still the predominant means of organizing, distributing, and promoting new music four decades later, well after the decline of physical media. The concept, of course, is that the record was to be recorded by the titular fictional band, a washed-up rock’n’roll group on the comeback trail. (This was actually the second concept earmarked for the Beatles’ next LP; the original, a record of songs about Liverpool, was abandoned when its first two tracks were needed for the group’s next single, “Strawberry Fields Forever”/ “Penny Lane”.) Probably for the best, little of the fictional-band vision for the record made it through; what did last from that conceit are a few tangential ideas– a satirical bent on popular entertainment and a curiosity with nostalgia and the past.

The record opens with a phony live performance by the Lonely Hearts Band, a sort of Vegas act– the sort of thing that, in 1963, people thought the almost certainly soon-to-be-passé Beatles would be doing themselves in 1967. Instead, the Beatles had completed their shattering of the rules of light entertainment, even halting their own live performances, which they’d never again do together for a paid audience.

Even as they mocked this old version of a performing band, ironically Sgt. Pepper’s and its ambitions helped to codify the rock band as artists rather than popular entertainers. In the hands of their followers, the notion of a pop group as a compact, independent entity, responsible for writing, arranging, and performing its own material would be manifested in the opposite way– rather than holing up in the studio and focusing on records, bands were meant to prove in the flesh they could “bring it” live. Notions of authenticity and transparency would become valued over studio output. (To be fair, upstart bands had to gig in order to get attention and a reputation, while the Beatles, of course, could write, break, and rewrite their own rules; they had the luxury and freedom to take advantage of a changing entertainment world and could experiment with different, emerging models of how to function as a rock band in much the same way that Trent Reznor or Radiohead can today.)

The freedom from live performance didn’t necessitate that Beatles songs now sounded practiced or rehearsed, and indeed they weren’t. Instead, they were studio creations assembled in sections and pieces. As the band splintered, this practice would spill over into releasing song sketches on the White Album and inspire, in part through necessity, the lengthy song cycle at the close of Abbey Road. On Sgt. Pepper’s, the most rewarding manifestation of this shift was the record’s most forward-looking piece, “A Day in the Life”. Complex in construction and epic in feel, “A Day in the Life” nevertheless seems enveloping and breezy to listeners. Indeed, the sustained, closing ringing chord of the song comes a mere 4:20 into the track.

“A Day”‘s only best-in-show competitor was McCartney’s “She’s Leaving Home”. (As on Revolver, the peaks here were a mold-breaking closer and classically inspired story-song). “A Day in the Life” has only grown in estimation, rightfully becoming one of the most acclaimed Beatles tracks. “She’s Leaving Home”, by contrast, has slid from view– perhaps too maudlin to work on classic rock radio and too MOR for hipster embrace, it was nevertheless the other headline track on Sgt. Peppers when it was released. The story of a runaway teen, it misses as a defiant generational statement in part because it’s actually sympathetic to the parents in the song. In the second verse, McCartney defies expectations by not following the young girl on her adventure but keeping the track set in the home as her parents wake to find her goodbye letter.

In the end, we learn “She” left home for “fun”– a rather churlish reason, and when paired with McCartney’s simplistic sentiments in “When I’m 64” (the aging couple there will be happy to “scrimp and save”), the young girl seems more selfish than trapped. In fact, for a group whose every move was a generational wedge, and for such a modern record, the Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s is oddly conservative in places: “Being For the Benefit of Mr. Kite” takes inspiration from a Victorian-era carnival; “When I’m 64” is a music-hall parody that fantasizes about what it would be like to be the Beatles’ grandparents’ age; “Fixing a Hole” has a rather mundane domestic setting; the fantasy girl in “Lovely Rita” is a ‘cop’ (Cosmic Dwellings note: The reviewer may be referring to the character in the latter song as a ‘traffic cop’ with the use of his ‘cop’ expression. However, The Beatles terminology refers to her as a “Meter Maid” which technically is a ‘Traffic Warden’, sometimes referred to as a Police Traffic Warden).

Lyrically, it’s an atypical way to usher in the Summer of Love, but musically, the record is wildly inventive, built on double-tracking, tape effects, and studio technology. The dream-like haze of “Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds”, the fairground, sawdust feel of “Mr. Kite”, and the cavalcade of sound effects at the end of “Good Morning Good Morning” were the most demonstrative sounds on the record, but otherwise benign passages were also steeped in innovation, whether recording from the inside of a brass instrument or plugging instruments directly into the sound board instead of capturing them through mics.

Almost everything done on Sgt. Pepper’s turned out to be new and forward-thinking, from the iconic record sleeve to the totemic ending to “A Day in the Life”. There are very few moments in pop music history in which you can mark a clear before and after, in which almost everything changed. In the UK, it’s arguably happened only five times, and on just four instances in the U.S. (Thriller here; acid house and punk there, and Elvis everywhere, of course); in both nations, the Beatles launched two of those moments.

In retrospect, it almost seems like this time the band itself was taken aback by its own accomplishments, not only shying from directly living up to Revolver via the smoke and mirrors of the Lonely Hearts Club Band but then never again throwing themselves into their work as a collective unit. Sgt. Pepper’s, possibly as a corrective to the hushed tones with which it’s been received for decades, has slipped in estimation behind a few of the band’s other records, but it’s easy to hear how it achieved that reputation in the first place. Even if John, Paul, George, and Ringo would arguably go on to best a handful of its moments, the amazing stretch of music created in 1966-67 was the peak of the Beatles as a working band.

[Note: Click here for an overview of the 2009 Beatles reissues, including discussion of the packaging and sound quality.]

via The Beatles: Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band | Album Reviews | Pitchfork.

Posted in Album, CD, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE BEACH BOYS: ‘Smiley Smile’ / ‘Wild Honey’ | Album Reviews | Pitchfork

Smile Smile

The Beach Boys

Smiley Smile

Capitol; 2001

By Spencer OwenMarch 29, 2001


In the mid-60’s, Brian Wilson declared a race to the next major development in record production techniques. Everything looked good in Wilson’s Beach Boys camp. He’d just produced one of the most revolutionary albums pop music had yet seen with 1966’s Pet Sounds, and the reports of the follow-up, Smile, were extremely promising. “Our new album will be better than Pet Sounds,” he pledged. “It will be as much an improvement over Sounds as that was over Summer Days.” One can only imagine how great an improvement that must have originally been, and how exhilarating it would have been to look forward to such a dramatic shift occurring again after such a short period of time.

So who were his worthy competitors? Well, there were The Beatles, and then… well, really, that was all. Always the tough competitors, the Beatles were the group with Rubber Soul, the album that inspired Wilson to create Pet Sounds in the first place. He respected and admired them, and felt he could beat them to a pulp. And with Smile set for release in late ’66, Wilson felt that he had the race “in the bag.”

That is, until December of 1966, at which time label disputes and tension within the group had reached such a level that Wilson forced himself to abandon the Smile project as he had envisioned it. To fulfill contractual obligations, the Beach Boys recorded Smiley Smile in the first three quarters of 1967. The hype died, the album failed, Sgt Pepper came out, and Wilson began a quick descent into madness. He stopped taking sole production credits, and lost all confidence, fully aware that, without the possibility of Smile ever being completed, he could never top Sgt. Pepper.

It’s truly a shame that Smile failed the way it did. And like any modern everyday thief in the age of Napster, I’ve been afforded the opportunity to hear the Smile recordings, or at least what’s out there, unfinished, with an “unofficial” tracklist. It’s hard to imagine how it would have sounded if completely finished; as it stands, however, it sounds like the beginning of something that could have changed popular music history. Perhaps we wouldn’t be so monotheistic in our pop leanings, worshipping only at the Beatles’ altar the way some do today. With the Smile material, full of vignettes, lush harmonies, unique arrangements and some of the most gorgeous of melodies, Brian Wilson proved that he was a man of virtually limitless genius.

So now that the history business is out of the way, let’s talk about what the Boys and Capitol Records chose to release in lieu of SmileSmiley Smile is a near-masterpiece. Without any awareness of Smile‘s existence, this album could have been a contemporary classic. Remnants of the vignette style are still there, along with a sense of humor both musical and lyrical. Group harmonies shine just as beautifully as any on Pet Sounds, and although the album isn’t anywhere close to the sonic revolution that Sgt. Pepper had already brought, Wilson’s innovative production and arrangements still bring out the best in every single track. And one of his best melodies can be found in “Wonderful,” matching, if not topping, anything on Pet Sounds.

As someone who’s heard the Smile sessions, I find many moments sorely missing, of course; if I had to choose, the most notable exclusion is the lounge-psychedelic mini-epic “Cabin Essence.” And the songs that do appear from Smile are pretty radically reworked, with the exception of “Good Vibrations,” already a #1 single from ’66, which can be found in its final and perfect form here. Strangely enough, the most disappointing re-recording is of “Wonderful”; standing on its own, the Smiley Smile version is gorgeous enough, but it nearly pales in comparison to the stripped-down harpsichord and heartbreaking harmonies of the original.

As for bonus tracks or outtakes included here, the centerpieces are those culled from the “Good Vibrations” sessions. There are some takes from the original recording sessions, in which we’re given a fascinating glimpse of Wilson’s way in the studio; he directed most of the players live, as if he were conducting minor symphonies in pop music. Also included is an early alternate version with different lyrics and even a slightly differing melody, which, while interesting to compare to the final version, just doesn’t fully succeed.

“Heroes and Villains” also appears in two forms. As Smiley Smile‘s opener, it remains a multi-part, multi-layered, harmonious pop single, true to the form of Wilson at his peak. Luckily, Van Dyke Parks collaborated on the lyrics as he did for much of Smile, ensuring a poetic success rather than a hit-or-miss Wilson affair, since Brian’s lyrics tended to miss more often than not. As a bonus track, it appears the way it may have been originally premiered on Smile, with even more random sections, unpredictable twists and vocal samples. Surprisingly, the re-recorded “Heroes” works even better; rather than relying on twists and turns, it’s based more on the voices of the gorgeous “psychedelic barbershop quartet,” as Jimi Hendrix once referred to it.

Indeed, Capitol were smart to include 1968’s Wild Honey on the disc as part of their two-for-one Beach Boys re-release series. But when comparing it to such an album as the one preceding it here, it barely deserves a paragraph. One or two of its tracks succeed, mostly when it’s either a classic bittersweet Wilson melody (“I’d Love Just Once to See You”) or a throwback to 50’s dance-pop (“How She Boogalooed It”). And naturally, the production still sounded good as long as Brian was at least in the studio. The rest of the record is in the R&B vein as interpreted by white surfer boys– Beach Boys, even. There’s also a Stevie Wonder cover sung with as much faux-soul as Carl Wilson could have possibly mustered. It’s not pretty, and, to be blunt, neither is the majority of Wild Honey.

Back to 1967, on the day the Beach Boys recorded the bare and light-hearted “Vegetables,” another track written for Smile: Paul McCartney decided to drop by the studio. He can be heard chewing vegetables for the track’s only percussion. And, as Al Jardine recalls, McCartney and Wilson could be seen together behind the console at one point, and McCartney even ventured to play Wilson the just-finished “A Day in the Life” before Sgt Pepper was even released. While a supposedly “burned-out” genius was creating the most simplistic recording he’d made in years, he became a first-hand witness to the popular sonic revolution that he could have been. In the public eye, the Beatles were the clear victors, and the people simply weren’t satisfied with second place. Now, with Smiley Smile finally reissued in America after years of out-of-print status, hopefully people will begin to analyze the whole race again. In my mind, it was a photo finish.

via The Beach Boys: Smiley Smile/Wild Honey | Album Reviews | Pitchfork.

A further appreciation of The Beach Boy’s original 1967 album release of “Smiley Smile” can be found at the following website: smileysmileheader
You can further check out the other ‘Smiley Smile’ links below starting with a review of The Beach Boys’ “The Smile Sessions”:
smile-box-set

Followed by “Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE” vs. The Beach Boys’ “SMiLE”
at this link:
Smile vs Smile Sessions

Posted in Album, CD, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BRIAN WILSON’s ‘SMiLE’ vs. THE BEACH BOYS’ ‘The Smile Sessions’ | Consequence of Sound

Ten years later, Dean Essner speculates which one’s the real deal.

BY ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2014, 6:25AM

Brian Wilson's SMiLE

How do you write a follow-up to Pet Sounds? Such was the dilemma of The Beach Boys architect Brian Wilson, who, at the time, was getting pulled in a variety of musical directions.

First, there was his experimental ambitions, fueled by a consistent diet of hallucinogenics as well as his partnership with composer and lyricist Van Dyke Parks that began in 1966. There was also the loud, disapproving choir of bandmates, fans and record company executives clamoring for the simple pop music days of yore. He’d eventually fail to satisfy both, and put out nothing. But before the stress and frustration of the various influencing voices in his life became too much to take, Wilson worked on SMiLE: a psychedelic rock collage of disjointed Americana– from the prairies to the tropics to the cities and then back again.

Brian Wilson collageHe famously scrapped the project in 1967, but some of its fundamental pieces would come out in drips and drabs on various Beach Boys releases: “Cabin Essence” thrown in the middle of the otherwise uneven 20/20, “Wind Chimes” in wispy, stripped-down form on the haphazardly compiled Smiley Smile. Even album centerpiece “Surf’s Up” got a whole record named after it. These small bits of insight would only further the mystery.

In 2004, Wilson went back into the studio with Parks and a new band to rerecord his masterpiece, allowing for the album’s initially-intended arc to finally come to realization. Upon the 10th anniversary of that record – titled Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE – we provide our own deconstruction, compiling a list of pros and cons in reference to the original Beach Boys demos (which finally saw a proper release in 2011) as well as the album’s overall folklore. And, of course, there’s the following overarching question: Does the 2004 release do justice to SMiLE’s legend or should the record have just remained a series of enigmatic scraps?

Pro – The “Surf’s Up” suite in its full form for the first time:

“Surf’s Up” is one of Brian Wilson’s finest and (most melancholy) achievements, a multipart symphony of sorts about leaving behind one’s nostalgic past. In the case of his band, that past is centered on writing songs about young love and frivolous beach play, making the title a brilliant, unsettling double entendre. As good as the song is as a standalone achievement as it exists on the 1971 album Surf’s Up, though, it needs its whole conceptual arc, which includes the tracks “Wonderful”, “Song For Children”, and “Child Is The Father Of The Man”. These set the tone for what’s to come with “Surf’s Up”, showcasing the song’s melody for the first time and slowly building tension.

Pro – The solidification of the album’s theme:

As aforementioned, SMiLE is a trek through America and its vastly diverse landscapes and essences: breezy, tropical Hawaii on “Roll Plymouth Rock”; rural farmlands on “Barnyard”; the quiet, tranquil forest on “Wind Chimes”; and the chaotic hustle of the city on “Mrs. O’ Leary’s Cow”. In individual form, each song vividly signifies one place. But on Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE, each stray location suddenly becomes a special part of a larger whole.

Pro – Van Dyke Parks finally gets his due

Van Dyke Parks

Much of SMiLE’s detailed, intricate storyline can be attributed to Van Dyke Parks, who conceptualized the project with Wilson and wrote a large portion of the album’s lyrics. But it took a long time for people to realize that. Even if you’re a Beach Boys purist and don’t believe that Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE should exist in the first place (without the help of his bandmates), then you should at least feel good for Parks. One can only imagine how draining the original 1966 sessions were, and it’s nice to know that all the work he put in finally amounted to something.

Con – Superfluous lyrics:

2011’s The Smile Sessions suggested an album largely unfinished, however some of the instrumental passages that lacked lyrics, I’d argue, were perfect as is. On Wilson’s 2004 version, in an attempt at filling up some of these empty spaces, Parks penned new words and I’m not sure all of them are necessary. For instance, on The Smile Sessions, “Holidays” (on Wilson’s edition it’s “On A Holiday”) has no vocals at all, allowing for the track’s wind instruments and marimbas to gorgeously swell at the front of the mix. But on Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE, Wilson sings a forgettable line about pirates, cluttering up the otherwise simple, feathery melody.

Con – It needs the Boys:

If I were pressed to pick my favorite moment on The Smile Sessions, it’d be the final movement to “Cabin Essence”, where the strings, harpsichord, and bass harmonica begin to furiously swirl and Mike Love sings that immortal line of bizarre yet harrowing psychobabble that he notoriously hated: “Over and over/ The crow cries/ Uncover the cornfield.” We still get that moment on Wilson’s 2004 version, but there’s less anger and befuddlement in his voice. Part of the appeal of The Smile Sessions is it showcases the beautiful, half-completed product above the bubbling-over, in-band turmoil below the surface. And the music is better for that juxtaposition. There may have been fighting amongst the Boys, but sometimes the best art is born out of such natural tension.

Con – The end of music’s greatest folklore

SMiLE

Before 2004, it was a tradition amongst Beach Boys fans to re-imagine your own ordering for SMiLE using the tracks that had already been released. But Wilson’s record renders that practice useless. There was a time when SMiLE was like a book that had been incinerated in a fire, with only stray pages or lines here and there surviving the flames. In essence, because it never made it to the public, it belonged to the public. It was a blank canvas that required everyone’s imagination to come to life. Therefore, it’s hard not consider Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE, as the album to officially end the legend, a letdown in some way.

via Brian Wilson’s SMiLE vs. The Beach Boys’ The Smile Sessions | Consequence of Sound.

A further comprehensive review of The Beach Boys’ “The Smile Sessions”/”SMiLE” can be viewed at the following link:

smile-box-set

A review of the 2001 CD reissue of “Smiley Smile” featuring “Wild Honey” can be viewed at the following link:

Smile Smile

Posted in Album, Blues, CD, Classical, Folk, Instrumental, Jazz, mp3, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE BEACH BOYS – “The Smile Sessions” | Album Reviews | Consequence of Sound

SMiLE

BY
ON NOVEMBER 03, 2011, 12:00PM

“Say, ‘Oh no, I’m stuck in my french horn.’” “It’s me. Brian. I’m in the microphone. It’s not a buzz. I’m really in here. I’m not kidding.” “Swim, swim, fishy. Swim, swim, fishy.” “Is it okay if I just take one of these carrots? Let me put ’em in my glove compartment.” –

That’s Brian Wilson: erratic genius, musical wunderkind, fabled nutbar, etc. Amongst all the eye-shuttering madness, his troubled character utters such hilarious catchphrases, including everyone’s favorite: “Let’s do one more, let it roll.”

Isn’t that what SMiLE always has been? A great serial? The stuff of rock ‘n’ roll lore? Perhaps one of the only true myths within the genre? On paper, it sure reads like it: “Acclaimed songwriter Brian Wilson loses mind while constructing the highly anticipated follow-up to The Beach Boys’ landmark album, 1966’s Pet Sounds. Once labeled Dumb Angel, the new LP goes by the title of Smile. Reports indicate he’s working with Van Dyke Parks and writing from a sandbox, constructed to his liking in his Beverly Hills home.” It’s a blessing producer Chuck Lorre wasn’t around at the time. Otherwise, we’d be experiencing The Smile Sessions on DVD today – with commentary, no less.

Instead, we’re left with a colossal box set, featuring hours of studio rehearsals, demos, and rare recordings. To fully grasp just how much time was spent in the studio, know there are 34 separate takes for Heroes & Villains here, and that’s only what they’ve made available. If only they had Internet memes back then; could you imagine the “before and after” shots of each musician involved? One Polaroid full of ambition, the next battered, destroyed, and wrecked. It’s easy to lose yourself in the countless studio takes. Little gasps of pure genius here and there. The slow dissolution to it all. The echoes of things to come. It’s a history lesson come to life, and that’s part of the reason the collection here works so well. You don’t have to listen to Wilson – and when we say Wilson, we’re talking about Brian – berate his band and surrounding musicians in that passive aggressive tone of his. But, if you do, you truly appreciate the final offering.

Especially if you’ve committed Wilson’s 2004 offering to memory. It just doesn’t compare anymore. There’s just no struggle within; it had been pacified by then. (That’s not to say Wilson didn’t struggle prior to 2004…) With this version – featuring the original band – Wilson had roped his bandmates in for a long, troubling fellowship that nobody involved had anticipated. Emotions bled into these songs, and unlike the 2004 incarnation, there’s a lot at stake here. Remember, this wasn’t recorded now. It was recorded then. The tensions and drama are wired into the tracks. And, say what you will about Mike Love – there’s plenty to pile on, don’t forget it – but his vocals offered priceless support. Listen to opening track Our Prayer. Both of them. Which one makes your hairs stand up? Which one tickles behind the eyes? Which one sounds like The Beach Boys?

That’s the real deal. Even Wilson himself feels that way. In his recently penned liner notes (as featured in the box set), he concludes, “I’ve often felt that I was on a musical mission, to spread the gospel of love through records. Probably nothing I’ve ever done has topped the music I made with Van Dyke, my old crew in the studio and the voices of my youth – me and The Beach Boys.” Few will disagree. Look no further than the final craftsmanship. Over 40 years later, SMiLE resembles the jaw-dropping entity that it was always destined to be; an aural equivalent of a Georges Seurat piece, if you will.

There’s just always something new to hear – a very telling facet of the work. Now, the real truth behind Wilson’s madness was his unwillingness to disregard the music he heard in his head. This is an attribute that explains the 30, 40, 50 takes. But, boy, did he need it. Take the album’s four key entries: Heroes & Villains”, “Surf’s Up”, “Vega-Tables”, and Good Vibrations. Each track sees Wilson shuffling about this proverbial music room, tuning and tweaking here and there. Then doing it again and again and again. It’s exhausting. It’s overwhelming. But it’s hands down some of the most impacting music of all time. These songs vindicate Wilson. You can’t listen to them without sympathizing with the man. Here’s some perspective: Would you let go of these sounds?

Of course, SMiLE is far more than a handful of four songs. For every inclusion, there are a thousand points of reference: the reflective, rollicking banjo in Cabin Essence, the windmill of harmonies behind Child Is Father of the Man, the cloud-swimming harpsichord that pushes Wonderful, and the instrumental paranoid delusions of The Elements: Fire (Mrs. O’Leary’s Cow). You could rewrite that sentence with a new hallmark for each song a hundred times over before you’d be at a loss for words. It’s that strong.

Truth be told, however, it’s not The Beach Boys’ greatest album. (You really can’t argue with the timeless themes of Pet Sounds. You just can’t.) But, it is their most important one. It also contains the group’s two best songs. Everyone loves “Good Vibrations” to death, and with good reason (e.g. Carl Wilson’s sky-searching vocals on the verse, Paul Tanner’s electro-theremin that still sounds extraterrestrial, and Love’s tender moment on the bridge), but it all chisels down to “Surf’s Up”. Upon hearing a rough demo of it in the early ’90s, Elvis Costello likened it to uncovering an early Mozart piece – how about that, another fella who’s right. There just isn’t any other song like it. Again, it’s all about the myriad moments within. There’s one – just before it breaks into the closing sea of harmonies – where Wilson lightly sings, “Surf’s up! Mmm. Aboard a tidal wave…” and it just crushes you. The undeniable beauty, the eroded innocence, and yet that mystifying assurance… fuck, it smothers the soul. As ol’ Brian would say, “Let’s do one more, let it roll.” Yes, forever, please.

Essential Tracks: “Surf’s Up”, “Good Vibrations”, “Cabinessence”, and “Our Prayer”

The Beach Boys – The Smile Sessions | Album Reviews | Consequence of Sound.

A review of Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE” vs. The Beach Boys’ “SMiLE” can be viewed at the following link:
Smile vs Smile Sessions

A review of the 2001 CD reissue of “Smiley Smile” featuring “Wild Honey” can be viewed at the following link:
Smile Smile

Posted in Album, CD, Instrumental, mp3, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Rock 'n' Roll, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“GOLD1E” – The Concept Album

Goldie the Concept Album - Copy

Cosmic Dwellings interviews GOLD1E writer, Tony G. Marshall about the idea behind the concept album of lyrical prose dedicated to his main character’s timeline of short stories –

Cosmic Dwellings: What inspired you to create an additional project for the “GOLD1E” serial?

Tony G. Marshall: I suppose the idea stems from having created the lyrics to songs for ‘Jim Maclaine’s ‘Dea Sancta et Gloria” rock opera during the time I was writing the script for the radio play of “That’ll be the Stardust!“. ‘Dea Sancta’ is as a tie-in to that radio project. Therefore, ‘Goldie Johnson’ is given the same music-related treatment for her ‘GOLD1E’ stories. 

CD: Apart from ‘Goldie’, do the lyrics of the potential songs share a common thread throughout their narrative?

TGM: The lyrics depict the elements of each associated ‘Goldie’ story. For example, Whirlpool To Reality”  is the ‘song’ which represents the first story in the series, A Purple Reign” and the lyrical concepts illustrate the darker aspects of that story as seen through Goldie’s eyes in the moment. Therefore, I would say that every ‘song’ being written is a standalone representation for each story but their ‘common thread’ is the main character. 

CD: Why have you decided to give the songs a different title to the actual story they each represent?

TGM: Individual artistic representation. Therefore, each song title is allowed to creatively flow into its own ‘pool’ of destination even though they represent an individual story in the serial. There’s a closer analysis of the first song after this interview (at the end of this article below). 

CD: The 2nd story in the “GOLD1E” serial is called The Song Remains The Same”, however, the song that represents this story is entitled, “Calling! what is the meaning behind this title?

TGM: The title is all to do with having a connection with somebody or someplace, or a place having a calling upon you which has a very magnetic force of attraction, whether it’s for either the right or wrong reasons. I wrote the verses to this song with obviously the locations of the story in mind, but also there’s these fabulous historical musical landscapes that illuminate the concepts within the song. 

CD: Have your songs/lyrics ever been inspired by other well-known songs?

TGM: That can happen from time to time. It happened with a couple of songs from ‘Jim Maclaine’s ‘Dea Sancta”. But, it’s mainly the inspiration behind the melody of another song, not the lyrics. No doubt it may happen again with the ‘Goldie’ project. In that sense it’s good to embark on another angle of ‘attack’ in your creative process. 

CD: Will each song share a particular musical genre or is it your intention to vary the mix of material?

TGM: At this point I suppose the rock genre is a primary focus with ‘Goldie’ being an avid rock music fan, and let’s not forget she does some singing throughout the timeline of stories too, but I would like to think that there’s the potential ideas to write ballad-type songs and soul or r’n’b songs throughout the creation of this concept album.

CD: The latest idea that you’ve come up with for this concept album is to include specially-written voice-over segments at the beginning and end of each song – what has inspired this idea?

TGM: I wanted to further cement the ‘concept’ factor of the project. The idea is unique to its concept. For example, “A Purple Reign” – the first story – has a color theme running through the start of it, so the voice parts reiterate those parts of the story which focus on this aspect. The text of these segments also provide the links in-between each song. 

CD: As you’re not a musician as such, how do you decide if you’re creating a rock song or a ballad-type composition throughout the process?

TGM: I suppose it’s all to do with the themes of each individual story which prompts my intuition toward that decision. Sometimes, I may have a feel for a melody or a chorus which consistently makes its presence felt with certain lyrics or verses. 

CD: Have you ever collaborated with any singer-songwriter musicians for any of your projects?

TGM: No. I did attempt to collaborate with musicians on a previous project. But, as a rule, I don’t like to rely on anyone else to provide inspiration in order to further my ideas of words or lyrics. This is due to the fact that I’ve never really found a musician dedicated enough who has wanted to, or been able to, provide their musical talent to accompany my lyrics. However, I’m not saying that’s a closed chapter or book. If the right type of dedicated musician, or musicians, came along and providing they could bring their enthusiasm and creativity to the project, then I would be willing to discuss such matters. 

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Below, Tony G. Marshall explains the concepts and themes within the lyrical prose of “Whirlpool To Reality” – the lyrics to the song can be accessed via this graphic link:

Whirlpool To Reality

1ST VERSE: 

  • The first verse of lyrics depict the start of the so-called ‘whirlpool’ or nightmare. It’s the river which is illustrated by the “surrounding shivers” .
  • The needles” act as a reference to both the spikey coldness from the river and the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center. Remember, the timeline of the story is pre-9/11.
  • clouds in creases” is exactly that, the “creases” may be caused by the falling dusk or the fact that the clouds are passing over the Twin Towers which is causing them to separate.

2ND VERSE: 

  • The second verse’s “man flailing” is in reference to Goldie’s late husband, Gil whom she sees in the nightmare sequence. Or, at least she assumes it’s Gil.
  • violet cascading” refers to the falling dusk once again.
  • A tempest crying” is a summation of how she feels, what she sees – it’s the whole sequence of events unfolding in a climaxing anxiety all around her.

BRIDGE: 

  • The bridge of the song relates to her reaching for Gil, but “you’re all gone” (in body and spirit) and it’s a “cloud that reigns” – it rules the situation because the dream or nightmare is continuous.

CHORUS:

  • The first part of the chorus obviously confirms the ‘opening door’ (‘the whirlpool’) to her realistic existence. But, she hasn’t quite reached that stage, therefore all actions including “Words spoken” all take on a form of unreality which in a sense makes her wonder if this is all a joke (“Jest”).
  • The second part of the chorus once again confirming that ‘whirlpool’ in the river. But maybe she has just passed through that route to her reality – just before she awakens and the “purple” that is in “reign” is the last thing she can remember before it transforms into the darkness into which she cannot see any further.

3RD VERSE:

  • The third verse takes us into another element of the dream. This time we are in the depths of the river with the “woman’s shadow” (silhouette) which is “below the silence” (in or beneath the depths).
  • “Cutting the eye within my mind” illustrates the effect the water is having on her sight. She’s hoping to see more clearly so that her mind is able to process the images better.
  • Her feelings and perception of the moment also spill over into the next line: “Splintering heart, leading the blind”. 
  • “A child aloft in the arms of innocence” is exactly that. The shadow she sees is as innocent in the situation as the child she holds up. It’s a very evocative combination.

4TH VERSE:

  • In the fourth verse, the “desperate call from the voice’s past” depicts a shout or an echo from the image that she sees. Possibly from the shadow itself.
  • “the mirror” is probably what she sees as elements of her life being magnified in the river. Then, it becomes her very own “looking-glass” from which the “terror” ‘bleeds’.
  • “The hand from above” reaches down to her, but it’s not a ‘saving hand’ or her savior. It’s exactly the opposite.

5TH VERSE:

  • In the fifth verse, we discover they’re the “hands of Satan”. The ‘satan’ of her nightmare. The one who created the nightmare in the first place. His “lust” is conveyed through his touch. His “eyes” also take charge in a “lusty” manner by provocatively enforcing her “doom”.
  • The ‘dream’ continues (“dancing” with her thoughts) as the ‘nightmare’ elements are now reinforced – “soaked in the reaper’s dust”. The expression “soaked” is used in reference to the river from which she has been pulled to face this ‘demon’. The ‘demon’ is from the past because he is “soaked” (or ‘cloaked’) in dust – something old.

6TH VERSE:

  • In the sixth verse, her “flailing fists” don’t resolve the situation and the struggle continues. “The past” begins to take hold and dominate. However, “the river” flows away but with a definite sadness. The feeling here resonates in the “ringing chimes” which sound out in the distance somewhere.

7TH VERSE:

  • The seventh verse alludes to the ‘sound’ of reality which is gradually becoming the dominating force as the dream/nightmare begins to fade (“dissolve”) along with the flow of the river.
  • The “images” from the sky in this verse are almost mirroring the river below. A great sense of flowing (“sailing”) into oblivion, but “symbols” of reality are gradually becoming more prominent after experiencing a “lost” or ‘limbo’ sensation. Reality taking over.

8TH VERSE:

  • The eighth verse brings her full circle only to experience the ‘flip side’ of the nightmare which turns out to be reality itself. The “leering”eyes of ‘Satan’ now look on helplessly in “fear”

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

For a further insight into the creation and development of “Whirlpool To Reality” then read the FREE 1st story of the “GOLD1E” serial, at the following link: A Purple Reign

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

*Tony G. Marshall expresses his sincere gratitude to Callum Gee for his assistance and organisation with this blog interview*

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The “GOLD1E” interview with Tony G. Marshall is at the following link:
Goldie quote 1

“THE SONG REMAINS THE SAME”The Prologue of the 2nd story in the “GOLD1E” serial is at the following link:
The Song Remains The Same promo

Goldie now with her very own dedicated Facebook and Twitter profiles at the following links below:

Goldie Facebook Page

FACEBOOK

“GOLD1E” Serial of short stories and its accompanying projects, characters and contents – Copyright ©2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 by Tony G. Marshall and Cosmic Dwellings. All Rights Reserved.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Posted in Album, Blues, Crime, Music, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Rock 'n' Roll, Short Story, Short Story Serial, Song, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE JUKEBOX: Put Another Nickel In… | uDiscover

 

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is elvis-and-jukebox.jpg

“We had these little juke joints, little taverns at that time. On a weekend there was this little place in the alley that would stay open all night. We called them Saturday night fish fries, they had two or three names; they called ‘em juke houses.”Muddy Waters

Juke is a West African word, in one language it means wicked or disorderly and in another Congolese language it means, a building without walls. The word juke passed into popular usage with a sexual overtone among African Americans from the Southern States, it later came to describe a sort of dance. Like many derivative words it’s almost impossible to get to the complete truth.

Generally Juke joints were found in rural areas and it has been suggested that there is a link to the jute fields and the jute workers that frequented makeshift bars. A juke joint typically had a bar that fronted onto the street, often with a dance floor and a back room for gambling or other activities; some Juke joints doubled as a brothel. The need for music in such a place is obvious. During the 1930’s itinerant musicians, often bluesmen, used the Juke Joints as their regular gigs. It was in a Juke that Robert Johnson watched Son House, while Tommy Johnson studied Charley Patton.

Robert Johnson Juke Joint
Robert Johnson was allegedly poisoned at this juke joint.

In 1928 Justus P. Seepburg invented one of the first jukeboxes and by the mid to late 1930s they could be found in bars, cafes, and juke joints right across America, but particularly in working class areas where people were less likely to own their own phonograph. In late 1938 Billboard began a new chart, which was a survey of the most popular records on Juke Boxes in America.

By 1939 there were 225,000 jukeboxes in America, which prompted James Caesar Petrillo, the President of the American Federation of Musicians to declare that records were “the number one scab”. He and his members felt that records and record companies were taking work away from musicians. Largely because of the juke box the AFM called a strike of its members in 1942; their motive was to persuade record companies to create a trust fund to compensate musicians who might lose live work as a result of records played on juke boxes and the radio. The strike ended in 1944 and the spread of the jukebox and the availability of an increasing number of phonographs was what the musicians strike had hoped to address. In reality the strike, along with the war, helped bring on the demise of the big band. The singer was the star; the traditional bandleader would never again be preeminent.

Black music of the late 1940s and early 1950s was what was most commonly found on jukeboxes. It was what evolved into rock ‘n’ roll and the beautiful looking jukeboxes became pivotal in spreading the gospel according to rock ‘n’ roll.

Films like American Graffiti fuelled the mythical status of the Juke Box, as did the teenagers who hung out in the diner in the hit TV show Happy Days. Standing around the record machine, deciding what to play, is an enduring image of a bygone era of unit uninterrupted happiness. Certain records just sound better on a juke box, but as most of us don’t have one to hand we’ve put together what we think is the start of the Ultimate Juke Box playlist. Let us know what you think we should add.

via Put Another Nickel in the Jukebox – uDiscover.

Posted in Album, Bluegrass, Blues, Country, Folk, Gospel, Instrument, Instrumental, Jazz, Music, Pop, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Rock 'n' Roll, Rockabilly, Song, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SO JUST WHAT WAS THE FIRST ROCK ‘N’ ROLL RECORD? – uDiscover

Rocket '88

“My man rocks me with one steady roll.” – Trixie Smith, 1922

Rock and roll is as old as mankind and the first rock ‘n’ roll record was Jackie Brenston and his Delta Cats’ ‘Rocket 88’ recorded at Sam Phillips’ Sun Studios in Memphis Tennessee. One of these two things is untrue, and it’s not that rock and roll is as old as mankind. Rock ‘n’ roll was little more than a euphemism among the Black population in early 20th Century America. There are some that think it was also a dance, but for some the difference between sex and dancing is as thin as the line between love and hate. Nor is it true that Alan Freed, the Cleveland DJ invented the term…but more of that later.

Nearly 90 years ago in September 1922 in New York City 27 year old Trixie Smith along with the Jazz Masters went into the studio to cut a couple of sides. Who made up the Jazz Masters have been lost down the crack in the shellac, all except one – Fletcher Henderson a name ubiquitous within jazz circles and whose band Louis Armstrong joined in 1924. One of the sides Trixie and the boys cut was ‘My Daddy Rocks Me (with one steady roll); as clear evidence as you can get for the link between rock and roll, and sex…

My daddy rocks me with one steady roll.
There’s no slippin’ when he once takes hold.
I looked at the clock and the clock struck one.
I said “Now Daddy, ain’t we got fun.”
He kept rockin’ with one steady roll.

Now hold those lyrics in your head because we’ll return to them soon enough. Four years after Trixie was rockin’ and rollin’ a man got around to it too; Blind Blake, whose Christian name may or may not have been Arthur, was the first to use the word ‘rock’ in a song. His earliest record for the Paramount label in August 1926 had ‘West Coast Blues’ on one side of it.

It opens with the lines…

Now we gonna do the old country rock.
First thing we do, swing your partners.

It’s a lot less sexy than Trixie and certainly seems to relate to some kind of dance, which is possibly evidence for the whole thing being a mix of both sex and dancing. Later in the song he even does a little advertising, “Good to the last drop. Just like Maxwell House Coffee, yes.” When President Theodore Roosevelt visited the manufacturer of Maxwell House in 1907, had a cup of their coffee, saying “It’s good to the last drop”; probably the only time a US President has been an advertising copy writer. There again it may also take us back towards the sex angle!

Three years later, in 1929, a twenty-five year old by the name of Tampa Red, who seems to have hailed from Florida, but grew up in Georgia and was a bit of a whizz on the kazoo, as well as piano and guitar decided to do a little rocking of his own. Tampa recorded such risqué songs as ‘It’s Tight Like That’ and ‘Jelly Whippin’ Blues’ but he also fronted the Hokum Jug Band. One weekend in April 1929 Tampa and his band recorded several tunes including ‘She is Hot’ which sounds like the perfect rock ‘n’ roll title and they also covered Trixie’s ‘’My Daddy Rocks Me (with one steady roll)’. Now, Tampa being a man doing a song about his Daddy rocking him with one steady roll obviously poses some questions, but on this occasion it wasn’t Tampa singing – it was instead the cross-dressing Frankie ‘Half-Pint’ Jaxon.

Frankie put his own slant on Trixie’s lyrics…

My Man rocks me with one steady roll.
It makes no difference if he’s hot or cold.
When I looked at the clock, clock struck one.
I said honey oh let’s have some fun.
But you rock me with one steady roll.

Frankie also goes in for some no holds barred, nor blushes spared, heavy breathing just in case anyone was in any doubt about what his song was all about. While the content, the words and the feel may all have some of the feel of rock ‘n’ roll about them the music for all this and the songs that went before did not. They were all very much in the blues idiom.

Rolling forward through the jazz age, the big bands, and generally the fuller sounds that became popular with black musicians and their audiences we get to 1945 and a man named Wynonie Harris.  Harris had sung with Lucky Millinder’s Orchestra, one of the swingiest, rockiest of the black big bands. In 1941, before Harris had joined them Millinder, who was a regular at the Apollo and the Savoy in Harlem, released ‘Big Fat Mama’ (“with meat shaking on her bones”) which was one of a number of his songs that pointed the way towards rock ‘n’ roll.

Harris took what he had learned with Millinder and distilled it into something all together more rock ‘n’ roll in the way it sounded. In July 1945, along with a band put together by Johnny Otis, Wynonie recorded ‘Around the Clock parts one and two’; compare their lyrics with Tampa’s…

Sometimes I think I will, sometimes I think I won’t.
Sometimes I believe I do, and then again I believe I won’t.
Well I looked at the clock, the clock struck one.
She said come on Daddy let’s have some fun.
Yes we were rolling, yes we rolled a long time.

Musically there was little rock ‘n’ roll about ‘Around The Clock’ but come 1957 and the great Chuck Berry recorded ‘Reelin’ and Rockin’. As we all know he, “looked at his watch and it was 9.21”. The fact is that what had gone before all led to that moment. So much music, black or white, was all about influences, acknowledged and otherwise, and the development of rock ‘n’ roll, as a concept, goes way back. As a sound it definitely had it’s origins in the jump music and R & B of the 1940s.

There are also those that think Alan Freed ‘invented’ rock ‘n’ roll.  There’s no question that Freed was a key player in the development of the music. On 11 July 1951, Freed started broadcasting on Cleveland’s WJW, calling his show The Moondog House. He played jump and R & B records and began calling it rock ‘n’ roll music; he also started promoting live shows featuring the artists he played like Tiny Grimes and Paul ‘Hucklebuck’ Williams.  Given the reach that his radio show gave him, even more so when he switched to WINS in New York City, it’s unsurprising that Freed has been so closely associated with the music, and its naming. But mentions of rocking and rolling were not the sole preserve of the black blues singers or the DJs that played the music. In 1934 the Boswell Sisters, a middle class, close harmony group from New Orleans released ‘Rock and Roll’, but theirs is a song of the high seas – “the rolling rocking rhythm of the sea”.

“So won’t you satisfy my soul with the rock and roll” – Teddy Grace, August 1937

In 1939, Western Swing star Buddy Jones released ‘Rockin’ Rollin’ Mama’. Two years earlier Teddy Grace recorded ‘Rock it For Me’, a couple of months later Chick Webb’s Orchestra with their singer Ella Fitzgerald did it too, like others they used the term in their own way, “So won’t you satisfy my soul with the rock and roll” Even Hollywood got in on the act when Betty Grable’s film, Wabash Avenue was promoted by calling her, ‘The First lady of rock and roll’. The point of it all? It was very much in the zeitgeist; it just needed Freed to bring it altogether.

So, how come many think that Jackie Brenston made the first rock ‘n’ roll record? Well for a start, Sam Phillips was fond of telling people that it was. But it’s just another record from the hundreds, thousands even, which came out in the post war years that had the feel of proto rock about them. Interestingly Wynonie Harris’ ‘Around the Clock’ while having the lyrical heritage does not sound much like a rock ‘n’ roll record – there are many others of his that definitely do. ‘Good Rocking Tonight’ from 1946 and so did ‘Lollipop Mama’ from 1948, with its fast walking bass line. There are hundreds of records that a case could be made for naming them as ‘The First Rock ‘n’ Roll record’. Here’s a list of ten records that could claim the title…in no particular order, other than the date they were recorded!

Rock, Daniel – Lucky Millinder and his Orchestra with Rosetta Tharpe (June 1941)
Be-Babba Leba – Helen Humes (August 1945)
My Gals A Jockey – Big Joe Turner (January 1946)
Choo Choo Ch’Boogie – Louis Jordan (July 1946)
The House of Blue lights – Ella Me Morse with Freddie Slack and his Orchestra (February 1946)
Gotta Gimme Whatcha Got – Julia Lee and her Boyfriends (September 1946)
He’s A Real Gone guy – Nellie Lutcher (July 1947)
Drinkin’ Wine Spo-Dee-O-Dee – Sticks McGhee and his Buddies (February 1949)
Rock the Joint –Jimmy Preston & His Prestonians (May 1949)
Teardrops From My Eyes – Ruth Brown (October 1950)

via So just what was the first rock ‘n’ roll record? – uDiscover.

Posted in 45rpm vinyl single, Bluegrass, Blues, Country, Folk, Gospel, Guitar, Instrument, Instrumental, Jazz, Music, Pop, Presentation, Production, Radio, Rhythm and Blues, Rock, Rock 'n' Roll, Rockabilly, Song, Soul | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

T. REX No. 1 That Took Four Years – uDiscover

Tyrannosaurus Rex would understandably have thought they’d cracked it when their first album, the expansively-titled ‘My People Were Fair and Had Sky in Their Hair…But Now They’re Content to Wear Stars on Their Brows’ hit the UK charts. Released in July 1968, it immediately made the bestsellers at No. 22, reaching its peak two weeks later at No. 15.

Then came a setback. Just three months later, Marc Bolan and his partner in the group, Steve Peregrin Took, released the follow-up album ‘Prophets Seers & Sages: The Angels of the Ages’ — and it missed the charts altogether. But 43 years ago today, four years after their first release, the two albums found themselves together at No. 1.

TRex-1st-album-cover-297x300What had happened in the interim, of course, was that after two more records as Tyrannosaurus Rex (‘Unicorn’ and ‘A Beard of Stars’), the band abbreviated itself, so to speak, leading to a serious national outbreak of T. Rexstasy and Bolanmania. The ‘T.Rex’ album of summer 1971 reached No. 7, then a ‘Best Of’ set of their early work went to No. 21, before ‘Electric Warrior’ charted in October and spent Christmas and the new year at No. 1.

David Platz, the music publisher who had founded by now founded Fly Records, re-released ‘Prophets Seers & Sages’ and ‘My People Were Fair’ as a double, gatefold album in mid-April, 1972, under the banner title ‘Tyrannosaurus Rex: A Beginning.’

Bolan’s new fans were now eager to snap up anything with his or his band’s name on it, and a single reissue of ‘Debora’ and ‘One Inch Rock’ was already in the top ten, at No. 7, in the week that the double album hit the charts at No. 2. A week later, the twinpack album went to No. 1, replacing Deep Purple’s ‘Machine Head.’ Bolan’s early creative outpourings had been completely embraced by his new audience.

Listen to ‘My People Were Fair and Had Sky in Their Hair…But Now They’re Content to Wear Stars on Their Brows’ on Spotify
Listen to ‘Prophets Seers & Sages The Angels of the Ages’ on Spotify
Download ‘My People…’ from Google Play or buy it from Amazon
Download ‘Prophets…’ from Google Play or buy it from Amazon
Explore our dedicated T. Rex Artist Page

via The T. Rex No. 1 That Took Four Years – uDiscover.

Posted in Album, Music | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment